Gülçin Gezgin1, Sietse J Luk2, Jinfeng Cao3, Mehmet Dogrusöz1, Dirk M van der Steen2, Renate S Hagedoorn2, Daniëlle Krijgsman1, Pieter A van der Velden1, Matthew G Field4, Gregorius P M Luyten1, Karoly Szuhai5, J William Harbour4, Ekaterina S Jordanova6, Mirjam H M Heemskerk2, Martine J Jager1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands3Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. 4. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 5. Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands7Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
Importance: Uveal melanoma (UM) is an intraocular primary malignant neoplasm that often gives rise to metastatic disease for which there are no effective therapies. A substantial proportion of UMs express the cancer-testis antigen PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma), which can potentially be targeted by adoptive T-cell therapy. Objective: To determine whether there may be a rationale for PRAME-directed T-cell therapy for metastatic UM. Design, Setting, and Participants: An experimental study using a retrospective cohort of 64 patients with UM (median follow-up, 62 months) was conducted from January 8, 2015, to November 20, 2016, at the Leiden University Medical Center. Clinical, histopathologic, and genetic parameters were compared between 64 PRAME-positive and PRAME-negative UMs. HLA class I restricted, PRAME-specific T cells were stimulated with UM cell lines to measure their antigen-specific reactivity against these cell lines, which were analyzed for PRAME expression by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Uveal melanoma metastases from 16 unrelated patients were assessed for PRAME expression by messenger RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and for HLA class I expression by immunofluorescence staining. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interferon γ production for antigen-specific reactivity and detection of PRAME and HLA class I expression in primary and metastatic UM. Results: Of the 64 patients in the study (31 women and 33 men; mean [SD] age at the time of enucleation, 60.6 [15.6] years), PRAME expression was negative in 35 primary UMs and positive in 29 primary UMs. Positive PRAME expression was associated with a high largest basal diameter (15.0 vs 12.0 mm; P = .005), ciliary body involvement (59% vs 26%; P = .008), and amplification of chromosome 8q (66% vs 23%; P = .002). PRAME-specific T cells reacted against 4 of 7 UM cell lines, demonstrating that T-cell reactivity correlated with PRAME expression. Metastatic UM samples were positive for PRAME messenger RNA in 11 of 16 patients and for HLA class I in 10 of 16 patients, with 8 of 16 patients demonstrating coexpression of both PRAME and HLA class I. Conclusions and Relevance: PRAME is expressed in many primary and metastatic UMs, and about half of the metastatic UMs coexpress PRAME and HLA class I. The finding that PRAME-specific T cells in this study reacted against PRAME-positive UM cell lines suggests a potential role for PRAME-directed immunotherapy for selected patients with metastatic UM.
Importance: Uveal melanoma (UM) is an intraocular primary malignant neoplasm that often gives rise to metastatic disease for which there are no effective therapies. A substantial proportion of UMs express the cancer-testis antigen PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma), which can potentially be targeted by adoptive T-cell therapy. Objective: To determine whether there may be a rationale for PRAME-directed T-cell therapy for metastatic UM. Design, Setting, and Participants: An experimental study using a retrospective cohort of 64 patients with UM (median follow-up, 62 months) was conducted from January 8, 2015, to November 20, 2016, at the Leiden University Medical Center. Clinical, histopathologic, and genetic parameters were compared between 64 PRAME-positive and PRAME-negative UMs. HLA class I restricted, PRAME-specific T cells were stimulated with UM cell lines to measure their antigen-specific reactivity against these cell lines, which were analyzed for PRAME expression by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Uveal melanoma metastases from 16 unrelated patients were assessed for PRAME expression by messenger RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and for HLA class I expression by immunofluorescence staining. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interferon γ production for antigen-specific reactivity and detection of PRAME and HLA class I expression in primary and metastatic UM. Results: Of the 64 patients in the study (31 women and 33 men; mean [SD] age at the time of enucleation, 60.6 [15.6] years), PRAME expression was negative in 35 primary UMs and positive in 29 primary UMs. Positive PRAME expression was associated with a high largest basal diameter (15.0 vs 12.0 mm; P = .005), ciliary body involvement (59% vs 26%; P = .008), and amplification of chromosome 8q (66% vs 23%; P = .002). PRAME-specific T cells reacted against 4 of 7 UM cell lines, demonstrating that T-cell reactivity correlated with PRAME expression. Metastatic UM samples were positive for PRAME messenger RNA in 11 of 16 patients and for HLA class I in 10 of 16 patients, with 8 of 16 patients demonstrating coexpression of both PRAME and HLA class I. Conclusions and Relevance: PRAME is expressed in many primary and metastatic UMs, and about half of the metastatic UMs coexpress PRAME and HLA class I. The finding that PRAME-specific T cells in this study reacted against PRAME-positive UM cell lines suggests a potential role for PRAME-directed immunotherapy for selected patients with metastatic UM.
Authors: Avital L Amir; Dirk M van der Steen; Renate S Hagedoorn; Michel G D Kester; Cornelis A M van Bergen; Jan W Drijfhout; Arnoud H de Ru; J H Frederik Falkenburg; Peter A van Veelen; Mirjam H M Heemskerk Journal: Blood Date: 2011-10-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Xiaoou Zhou; Gianpietro Dotti; Robert A Krance; Caridad A Martinez; Swati Naik; Rammurti T Kamble; April G Durett; Olga Dakhova; Barbara Savoldo; Antonio Di Stasi; David M Spencer; Yu-Feng Lin; Hao Liu; Bambi J Grilley; Adrian P Gee; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop; Malcolm K Brenner Journal: Blood Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Inge H G Bronkhorst; Long V Ly; Ekaterina S Jordanova; Johannes Vrolijk; Mieke Versluis; Gregorius P M Luyten; Martine J Jager Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Willem Maat; Geert W Haasnoot; Frans H J Claas; Nicoline E Schalij-Delfos; Geziena M T Schreuder; Martine J Jager Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ekaterina S Jordanova; Arko Gorter; Ouissam Ayachi; Frans Prins; Lindy G Durrant; Gemma G Kenter; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Gert Jan Fleuren Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Willem Maat; Long V Ly; Ekaterina S Jordanova; Didi de Wolff-Rouendaal; Nicoline E Schalij-Delfos; Martine J Jager Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: I De Waard-Siebinga; D J Blom; M Griffioen; P I Schrier; E Hoogendoorn; G Beverstock; E H Danen; M J Jager Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1995-07-17 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Patricia Rusa Pereira; Alexandre Nakao Odashiro; Li-Anne Lim; Cristina Miyamoto; Paula L Blanco; Macanori Odashiro; Shawn Maloney; Dominique F De Souza; Miguel N Burnier Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2013-08-22
Authors: Matthew G Field; Michael A Durante; Christina L Decatur; Bercin Tarlan; Kristen M Oelschlager; John F Stone; Jeffim Kuznetsov; Anne M Bowcock; Stefan Kurtenbach; J William Harbour Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-09-13
Authors: J William Harbour; Manuel Paez-Escamilla; Louis Cai; Scott D Walter; James J Augsburger; Zelia M Correa Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Saman S Ahmadian; Ian J Dryden; Andrea Naranjo; Angus Toland; Romain A Cayrol; Donald E Born; Peter S Egbert; Ryanne A Brown; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Jonathan H Lin Journal: Ocul Oncol Pathol Date: 2022-03-11