Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Research grants: Conform and be funded.

Literature DB >> 23222591

Research grants: Conform and be funded.

Joshua M Nicholson¹, John P A Ioannidis.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2012 PMID： 23222591 DOI： 10.1038/492034a

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN： 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962

× No keyword cloud information.

7 in total

1. Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups.

Authors: Iain D Couzin; Christos C Ioannou; Güven Demirel; Thilo Gross; Colin J Torney; Andrew Hartnett; Larissa Conradt; Simon A Levin; Naomi E Leonard
Journal: Science Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 47.728

2. Collegiality and careerism trump critical questions and bold new ideas: a student's perspective and solution. The structure of scientific funding limits bold new ideas.

Authors: Joshua M Nicholson
Journal: Bioessays Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 4.345

3. More time for research: fund people not projects.

Authors: John P A Ioannidis
Journal: Nature Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 49.962

4. The h index and career assessment by numbers.

Authors: Clint D Kelly; Michael D Jennions
Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2006-02-03 Impact factor: 17.712

5. Sources of funding for Nobel Prize-winning work: public or private?

Authors: Athina Tatsioni; Effie Vavva; John P A Ioannidis
Journal: FASEB J Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 5.191

6. Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?

Authors: D F Horrobin
Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-11-09 Impact factor: 79.321

7. Why current publication practices may distort science.

Authors: Neal S Young; John P A Ioannidis; Omar Al-Ubaydli
Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 11.069

7 in total

35 in total

1. Are scientists a workforce? - Or, how Dr. Frankenstein made biomedical research sick: A proposed plan to rescue US biomedical research from its current 'malaise' will not be effective as it misdiagnoses the root cause of the disease.

Authors: Yuri Lazebnik
Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 8.807

10. The Pitt Innovation Challenge (PInCh): Driving Innovation in Translational Research Through an Incentive-Based, Problem-Focused Competition.

Authors: Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick; John Maier; Laurel Yasko; David Mathias; Kacy Qua; Erika Wagner; Elizabeth Miller; Steven E Reis
Journal: Acad Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 6.893

Research grants: Conform and be funded.

1. Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups.

2. Collegiality and careerism trump critical questions and bold new ideas: a student's perspective and solution. The structure of scientific funding limits bold new ideas.

3. More time for research: fund people not projects.

4. The h index and career assessment by numbers.

5. Sources of funding for Nobel Prize-winning work: public or private?

6. Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?

7. Why current publication practices may distort science.

1. Are scientists a workforce? - Or, how Dr. Frankenstein made biomedical research sick: A proposed plan to rescue US biomedical research from its current 'malaise' will not be effective as it misdiagnoses the root cause of the disease.

2. An efficient system to fund science: from proposal review to peer-to-peer distributions.

3. A generation at risk: young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce.

4. NIH funding: Thousand-citation papers are outliers.

5. NIH funding: It does support innovators.

6. NIH funding: Agency rebuts critique.

7. Graphics: Chance thrown by inaccurate dice.

8. NIH funding: The critics respond.

9. Quantifying Conceptual Novelty in the Biomedical Literature.

10. The Pitt Innovation Challenge (PInCh): Driving Innovation in Translational Research Through an Incentive-Based, Problem-Focused Competition.