Literature DB >> 16699457

Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptom burden and health-related quality of life following conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium.

Laurence Chan1, Shamkant Mulgaonkar, Rowan Walker, Wolfgang Arns, Patrice Ambühl, Ruben Schiavelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of converting renal transplant recipients with gastrointestinal (GI) complaints from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) has not been evaluated using patient-reported outcomes.
METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, prospective study was undertaken in MMF-treated renal transplant patients. Patients experiencing GI complaints were converted to equimolar EC-MPS (Cohort A). Patients without GI complaints remained on MMF (Cohort B). At baseline and Visit 2 (4-6 weeks postbaseline), patients completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and Psychological General Well-being Index (PGWBI). At Visit 2, patients and physicians completed the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) scale for GI symptoms. Additionally, patients completed the OTE for health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Minimal important difference (MID) was calculated for GSRS and GIQLI based on patients' and physicians' OTE evaluation.
RESULTS: Of 328 patients enrolled (i.e. the intent-to-treat and safety populations), 278 formed the per-protocol population (Cohort A, n=177; Cohort B, n=101). At baseline, Cohort A had significantly worse scores on all GSRS, GIQLI and PGWBI subscales compared to Cohort B (all P<0.0001). All GSRS, GIQLI and PGWBI subscale scores improved significantly in Cohort A between baseline and Visit 2 (all P<0.0001). Mean improvements in all GSRS subscales and most GIQLI subscores exceeded the calculated MID. GSRS, GIQLI and PGWBI subscales remained stable in Cohort B.
CONCLUSION: This first exploratory study indicates that converting patients with mild, moderate or severe GI complaints from MMF to EC-MPS significantly reduces GI-related symptom burden and improves patient functioning and well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699457     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000209411.66790.b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  24 in total

Review 1.  Current state of renal transplant immunosuppression: Present and future.

Authors:  Hari Varun Kalluri; Karen L Hardinger
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2012-08-24

2.  A randomized controlled trial of chiropractic management of the lower limb kinetic chain for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis: a study protocol.

Authors:  Katie de Luca; Henry Pollard; James Brantingham; Gary Globe; Tammy Cassa
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-04-05

Review 3.  Immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: progress to date.

Authors:  Raymond L Heilman; Marek J Mazur; K Sudhakar Reddy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Improved gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus.

Authors:  Hyeon Seok Hwang; Bok Jin Hyoung; Sol Kim; Ha Young Oh; Yon Su Kim; Jung Kyung Kim; Yeong Hoon Kim; Yong Lim Kim; Chan Duck Kim; Gyu Tae Shin; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Economic impact and long-term graft outcomes of mycophenolate mofetil dosage modifications following gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Gerardo Machnicki; Jean-Francois Ricci; Daniel C Brennan; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  [Effect of calcium channel blocker in combination with an angiotensin II receptor blocker in Japanese patients with hypertension].

Authors:  Takao Saruta
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo pediatric renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Patrick Niaudet; Marina Charbit; Chantal Loirat; Anne-Laure Lapeyraque; Michel Tsimaratos; Mathilde Cailliez; Michel Foulard; Maud Dehennault; Pierre Marquet; Kamel Chaouche-Teyara; Djamila Lemay
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a review of its use in the prevention of renal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Patrick Fk Yong; David P D'Cruz
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-06

10.  Mycophenolic acid formulations in adult renal transplantation - update on efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  Déla Golshayan; M Pascual; Bruno Vogt
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.