Literature DB >> 18850764

Economic impact and long-term graft outcomes of mycophenolate mofetil dosage modifications following gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant recipients.

Gerardo Machnicki1, Jean-Francois Ricci, Daniel C Brennan, Mark A Schnitzler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) complications are common following renal transplantation. Discontinuing or reducing the dosage of mycophenolate mofetil can improve GI tolerability but adversely affect graft outcomes. This analysis was undertaken to assess the 3-year economic and clinical impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosage modifications or discontinuation following post-transplant GI events compared with no dosage modification.
METHODS: Adult renal transplant recipients with a Medicare-covered mycophenolate mofetil prescription at the time of GI complication between 1995 and 2000 were drawn from the US Renal Data System (USRDS). The 3-year graft survival rates after first diagnosis of a GI complication were obtained in four cohorts of patients according to mycophenolate mofetil administration within 6 months of initial GI diagnosis: (i) no dosage change in mycophenolate mofetil (NC); (ii) one or more episodes of mycophenolate mofetil dosage reduction <50% of the initial dosage, lasting >30 days (DR <50%); (iii) one or more episodes of mycophenolate mofetil dosage reduction >or=50% of the initial dosage, lasting >30 days (DR >or=50%); and (iv) one or more episodes of mycophenolate mofetil discontinuation >30 days (DC).Two multivariate models were used to estimate the association between DR and DC and graft survival <6 months after GI diagnosis and 6-36 months after diagnosis. In each cohort, Medicare costs for maintaining a patient with stable function were calculated using regression and were augmented with cost of graft failure, resumed maintenance dialysis and death post-graft loss using Medicare data supplied by the USRDS. Survival and cost outcomes were integrated in a 3-year Markov model with 6-month cycles. The perspective was that of Medicare, and costs and outcomes were discounted by 3% per annum.
RESULTS: Adult patients (n = 3589) with a mycophenolate mofetil prescription at time of diagnosis of GI event were identified: NC = 2230 (62.1%); DR <50% = 247 (6.9%); DR >or=50% = 348 (9.7%); and DC = 764 (21.3%). In the first 6 months after GI diagnosis, DC was associated with increased risk of graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] 3.20; 95% CI 1.71, 5.99; p < 0.0001). During the period 6-36 months after GI diagnosis, the HR for graft loss was higher for the DR >or=50% group (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.02, 1.70; p < 0.05) and DC group (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09, 1.69; p < 0.01) relative to the NC group.Expected 3-year cumulative Medicare costs per patient were USD 68,495 for the NC and DR <50% groups, USD 70,886 for the DR >or=50% group, USD 79,015 for the DC group and USD 70,967 overall. Respective QALYs were 2.32, 2.30, 2.27 and 2.31. In sensitivity analysis, reducing the rate of DR and DC by 25% would have lowered expected costs by USD 2.2 million in the study population and increased QALYs by 11.2. Monte Carlo simulation indicated a 93% probability that such reduction in the relative risk of mycophenolate mofetil DR/DC was cost saving or cost neutral.
CONCLUSION: Dosage reduction or discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil in the first 6 months after diagnosis of GI complications is associated with significantly increased risk of graft failure and increased healthcare costs in adult renal transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18850764     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200826110-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  40 in total

1.  Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal complications and appendicitis after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  E A Santiago-Delpin; L A Morales-Otero; Z A González
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Consequences of eliminating HLA-B in deceased donor kidney allocation to increase minority transplantation.

Authors:  Nzisa Mutinga; Daniel C Brennan; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action.

Authors:  A C Allison; E M Eugui
Journal:  Immunopharmacology       Date:  2000-05

Review 5.  Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management.

Authors:  M Behrend
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection.

Authors:  A O Ojo; H U Meier-Kriesche; J A Hanson; A B Leichtman; D Cibrik; J C Magee; R A Wolfe; L Y Agodoa; B Kaplan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group.

Authors:  J D Pirsch; J Miller; M H Deierhoi; F Vincenti; R S Filo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Incidence, complications, treatment, and outcome of ulcers of the upper gastrointestinal tract after renal transplantation during the cyclosporine era.

Authors:  C Troppmann; B E Papalois; A Chiou; E Benedetti; D L Dunn; A J Matas; J S Najarian; R W Gruessner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Ronald P Pelletier; Baris Akin; Mitchell L Henry; Ginny L Bumgardner; Elmahdi A Elkhammas; Amer Rajab; Ronald M Ferguson
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.863

View more
  4 in total

1.  Influence of sex and race on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in stable African American and Caucasian renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Kathleen M Tornatore; Calvin J Meaney; Gregory E Wilding; Shirley S Chang; Aijaz Gundroo; Louise M Cooper; Vanessa Gray; Karen Shin; Gerald J Fetterly; Joshua Prey; Kimberly Clark; Rocco C Venuto
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Regimen Compared with Triple Regimens in Patients with Mycophenolic Acid-Related Gastrointestinal Complications After Renal Transplantation: A Short-Term Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Zhiguo Peng; Wanhua Xian; Huaibin Sun; Engang Li; Lina Geng; Jun Tian
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 1.530

3.  Does reduction in mycophenolic acid dose compromise efficacy regardless of tacrolimus exposure level? An analysis of prospective data from the Mycophenolic Renal Transplant (MORE) Registry.

Authors:  Anthony Langone; Cataldo Doria; Stuart Greenstein; Mohanram Narayanan; Kimi Ueda; Bashir Sankari; Oleh Pankewycz; Fuad Shihab; Laurence Chan
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Association of mycophenolic acid dose with efficacy and safety events in kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus: an analysis of the Mycophenolic acid Observational REnal transplant registry.

Authors:  Cataldo Doria; Stuart Greenstein; Mohanram Narayanan; Kimi Ueda; Anne Wiland; Kevin McCague; Bashir Sankari; Laurence Chan
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.863

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.