BACKGROUND: Grading and staging of liver biopsies in patients with chronic hepatitis remains an inexact "gold standard" that is influenced by variabilities in scoring systems, sampling, observer agreement and expertise. Spatial disease variability relative to markers of the adequacy of biopsy has not been studied previously. METHODS: Paired liver biopsy specimens were obtained from the right and left hepatic lobes of 60 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Histological grade and disease stage were assessed according to the Ludwig scoring system, and scores were evaluated in relation to differences in size and number of portal tracts in all paired samples. RESULTS: The relative difference (%) in aggregate biopsy size and number of portal tracts was similar between paired samples with and without a difference in grade. Paired samples with a difference in stage showed a larger relative difference in biopsy size (p = 0.09) and in the number of portal tracts (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a difference of one grade or one stage in 30% of paired liver biopsies, due to a combination of sampling variability and observer variability. Acknowledgment of "built-in" variability in grading and staging chronic hepatitis C by both clinicians and pathologists is essential for managing the individual patient with chronic hepatitis C.
BACKGROUND: Grading and staging of liver biopsies in patients with chronic hepatitis remains an inexact "gold standard" that is influenced by variabilities in scoring systems, sampling, observer agreement and expertise. Spatial disease variability relative to markers of the adequacy of biopsy has not been studied previously. METHODS: Paired liver biopsy specimens were obtained from the right and left hepatic lobes of 60 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Histological grade and disease stage were assessed according to the Ludwig scoring system, and scores were evaluated in relation to differences in size and number of portal tracts in all paired samples. RESULTS: The relative difference (%) in aggregate biopsy size and number of portal tracts was similar between paired samples with and without a difference in grade. Paired samples with a difference in stage showed a larger relative difference in biopsy size (p = 0.09) and in the number of portal tracts (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a difference of one grade or one stage in 30% of paired liver biopsies, due to a combination of sampling variability and observer variability. Acknowledgment of "built-in" variability in grading and staging chronic hepatitis C by both clinicians and pathologists is essential for managing the individual patient with chronic hepatitis C.
Authors: O S Jaffer; P F C Lung; D Bosanac; V M Patel; S M Ryan; M A Heneghan; A Quaglia; P S Sidhu Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Kiran Bambha; Christopher Pierce; Christopher Cox; Audrey L French; Phyllis C Tien; Gerald B Sharp; Michael Augenbraun; Marshall J Glesby; Maria C Villacres; Michael Plankey; Howard D Strickler; Stephen J Gange; Marion G Peters Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Parvathi Mohan; Bruce A Barton; Michael R Narkewicz; Jean P Molleston; Regino P Gonzalez-Peralta; Philip Rosenthal; Karen F Murray; Barbara Haber; Kathleen B Schwarz; Zachary D Goodman Journal: Hepatology Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 17.425