Literature DB >> 22763032

Acoustic radiation force impulse quantification: repeatability of measurements in selected liver segments and influence of age, body mass index and liver capsule-to-box distance.

O S Jaffer1, P F C Lung, D Bosanac, V M Patel, S M Ryan, M A Heneghan, A Quaglia, P S Sidhu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the inter- and intra-observer variability of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) quantification in liver segments with influence of age, body mass index (BMI) and liver capsule-to-box (CB) distance.
METHODS: 10 healthy volunteers were examined twice, by three experienced operators, separated by a 1-week interval. 10 readings were obtained, from segments 3, 5/6 and 7/8. Age, BMI and the CB distance were noted. The Cronbach α statistic for analysis of reliability was performed for the inter- and intra-observer studies. Multivariate linear regression models determined significance of the other parameters.
RESULTS: 1800 velocity measurements were recorded. Mean values±standard deviation: segment 3, 1.31±0.19 m s(-1); segment 5/6, 1.12±0.22 m s(-1); segment 7/8, 1.12±0.17 m s(-1). For both the inter- and intra-observer study, the Cronbach α statistic was ≥0.7 (reliable) when taken from segments 5/6 and 7/8 but <0.7 (unreliable) for segment 3. BMI and age showed significant (p<0.0001) but contrasting correlation (segment 5/6: BMI r=0.02, age r=-0.02; segment 7/8: BMI r=-0.01, age r=0.01) with ARFI velocities when analysed for the segments deemed reliable. A weak negative correlation between ARFI velocities and liver CB distance was demonstrated for both assessed segments (segment 5/6, r=-0.08; segment 7/8, r=-0.06; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: With trained operators, ARFI is a reliable and reproducible method of liver stiffness quantification in segments 5/6 and 7/8 but acquisition of measurements from segment 3 should be avoided. Values obtained deeper to the liver capsule allow more reliable liver stiffness quantification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22763032      PMCID: PMC3474007          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/74797353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: US-based acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Masato Yoneda; Kaori Suzuki; Shingo Kato; Koji Fujita; Yuichi Nozaki; Kunihiro Hosono; Satoru Saito; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Assessment of renal allograft fibrosis by acoustic radiation force impulse quantification--a pilot study.

Authors:  Trygve Syversveen; Knut Brabrand; Karsten Midtvedt; Erik H Strøm; Anders Hartmann; Jarl A Jakobsen; Audun E Berstad
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.782

4.  An in vitro assessment of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for visualizing cardiac radiofrequency ablation lesions.

Authors:  Stephanie A Eyerly; Stephen J Hsu; Shruti H Agashe; Gregg E Trahey; Yang Li; Patrick D Wolf
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-12-15

5.  On the feasibility of imaging peripheral nerves using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Jeremy J Dahl; David B MacLeod; Stuart A Grant; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Carmen Fierbinteanu-Braticevici; Dan Andronescu; Radu Usvat; Dragos Cretoiu; Cristian Baicus; Gabriela Marinoschi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Katrin Wunder; Susanne Kriener; Fariba Sotoudeh; Swantje Richter; Joerg Bojunga; Eva Herrmann; Thierry Poynard; Christoph F Dietrich; Johannes Vermehren; Stefan Zeuzem; Christoph Sarrazin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for fibrosis staging of chronic liver disease: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hirokazu Takahashi; Naofumi Ono; Yuichiro Eguchi; Takahisa Eguchi; Yoichiro Kitajima; Yasunori Kawaguchi; Shunya Nakashita; Iwata Ozaki; Toshihiko Mizuta; Shuji Toda; Sho Kudo; Atsushi Miyoshi; Kohji Miyazaki; Kazuma Fujimoto
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 5.828

9.  Lower-limb vascular imaging with acoustic radiation force elastography: demonstration of in vivo feasibility.

Authors:  Douglas Dumont; Jeremy Dahl; Elizabeth Miller; Jason Allen; Brian Fahey; Gregg Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 10.  Liver biopsy for histological assessment: The case against.

Authors:  Faisal M Sanai; Emmet B Keeffe
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

View more
  19 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) imaging in primary Sjoegren`s syndrome.

Authors:  Andreas Knopf; Benedikt Hofauer; Klaus Thürmel; Reinhard Meier; Konrad Stock; Murat Bas; Naglaa Manour
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The efficiency of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julia Nierhoff; Andrea Angelina Chávez Ortiz; Eva Herrmann; Stefan Zeuzem; Mireen Friedrich-Rust
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Ultrasound in Radiology: From Anatomic, Functional, Molecular Imaging to Drug Delivery and Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 4.  Non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Suraj Sharma; Korosh Khalili; Geoffrey Christopher Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Parameters affecting different acoustic radiation force impulse applications in the diagnosis of fibrotic liver changes.

Authors:  Sabrina Galgenmueller; Heike Jaeger; Wolfgang Kratzer; Stefan A Schmidt; Suemeyra Oeztuerk; Mark M Haenle; Richard A Mason; Tilmann Graeter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Principles of ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Arinc Ozturk; Joseph R Grajo; Manish Dhyani; Brian W Anthony; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

Review 7.  Acoustic radiation force impulse of the liver.

Authors:  Mirko D'Onofrio; Stefano Crosara; Riccardo De Robertis; Stefano Canestrini; Emanuele Demozzi; Anna Gallotti; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements.

Authors:  Giovanna Ferraioli; Carmine Tinelli; Raffaella Lissandrin; Mabel Zicchetti; Stefano Bernuzzi; Laura Salvaneschi; Carlo Filice
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Ultrasound in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  J F Gerstenmaier; R N Gibson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-05-24

10.  The Role of Spleen Stiffness in Determining the Severity and Bleeding Risk of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhotic Patients.

Authors:  Hwi Young Kim; Eun Hyo Jin; Won Kim; Jae Young Lee; Hyunsik Woo; Sohee Oh; Ji-Yeon Seo; Hong Sang Oh; Kwang Hyun Chung; Yong Jin Jung; Donghee Kim; Byeong Gwan Kim; Kook Lae Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.