Literature DB >> 19669358

Liver fibrosis: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL).

Gamal Shiha1, Shiv Kumar Sarin, Alaa Eldin Ibrahim, Masao Omata, Ashish Kumar, Laurentius A Lesmana, Nancy Leung, Nurdan Tozun, Saeed Hamid, Wasim Jafri, Hitoshi Maruyama, Pierre Bedossa, Massimo Pinzani, Yogesh Chawla, Gamal Esmat, Wahed Doss, Taher Elzanaty, Puja Sakhuja, Ahmed Medhat Nasr, Ashraf Omar, Chun-Tao Wai, Ahmed Abdallah, Mohsen Salama, Abdelkhalek Hamed, Ayman Yousry, Imam Waked, Medhat Elsahar, Amr Fateen, Sherif Mogawer, Hassan Hamdy, Reda Elwakil.   

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a common pathway leading to cirrhosis, which is the final result of injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Liver biopsy has been considered to be the "gold standard" to assess fibrosis. However, liver biopsy being invasive and, in many instances, not favored by patients or physicians, alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis have assumed great importance. Moreover, therapies aimed at reversing the liver fibrosis have also been tried lately with variable results. Till now, there has been no consensus on various clinical, pathological, and radiological aspects of liver fibrosis. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved the following: review of all available published literature by a core group of experts; proposal of consensus statements by the experts; discussion of the contentious issues; and unanimous approval of the consensus statements after discussion. The Oxford System of evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The consensus statements are presented in this review.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19669358      PMCID: PMC2716768          DOI: 10.1007/s12072-008-9114-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Int        ISSN: 1936-0533            Impact factor:   6.047


  68 in total

Review 1.  Resolving fibrosis in the diseased liver: translating the scientific promise to the clinic.

Authors:  Ajay K Muddu; Indra Neil Guha; Ahmed M Elsharkawy; Derek A Mann
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.085

2.  Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis.

Authors:  Francesco Vizzutti; Umberto Arena; Roberto G Romanelli; Luigi Rega; Marco Foschi; Stefano Colagrande; Antonio Petrarca; Stefania Moscarella; Giacomo Belli; Anna Linda Zignego; Fabio Marra; Giacomo Laffi; Massimo Pinzani
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  Biology of hepatic stellate cells and their possible relevance in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis.

Authors:  M Pinzani; P Gentilini
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

Review 4.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Reproducibility of liver biopsy diagnosis in relation to the size of the specimen.

Authors:  B Hølund; H Poulsen; P Schlichting
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Laurent Castéra; Julien Vergniol; Juliette Foucher; Brigitte Le Bail; Elise Chanteloup; Maud Haaser; Monique Darriet; Patrice Couzigou; Victor De Lédinghen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Signal intensity of the liver parenchyma in microbubble contrast agent in the late liver phase reflects advanced fibrosis of the liver.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kaneko; Osamu Teshigawara; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hirota; Soichiro Inoue; Shin Takeda; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.828

8.  Hepascore: an accurate validated predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection.

Authors:  Leon A Adams; Max Bulsara; Enrico Rossi; Bastiaan DeBoer; David Speers; Jacob George; James Kench; Geoffrey Farrell; Geoffrey W McCaughan; Gary P Jeffrey
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  FIBROSpect II: a potential noninvasive test to assess hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  F Fred Poordad
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.225

10.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient as a predictor of fibrosis in chronic liver disease because of hepatitis B virus.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Ashish Kumar; Syed Hissar; Pankaj Jain; Archana Rastogi; Deepak Kumar; Puja Sakhuja; Shiv K Sarin
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.828

View more
  34 in total

1.  Correlation of aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index with hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Vipin Verma; Shiv Kumar Sarin; Praveen Sharma; Ashish Kumar
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Fibrosis and AST to platelet ratio index predict post-operative prognosis for solitary small hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hung-Hsu Hung; Chien-Wei Su; Chiung-Ru Lai; Gar-Yang Chau; Che-Chang Chan; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Teh-Ia Huo; Pui-Ching Lee; Wei-Yu Kao; Shou-Dong Lee; Jaw-Ching Wu
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 6.047

3.  A simple bedside blood test (Fibrofast; FIB-5) is superior to FIB-4 index for the differentiation between non-significant and significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  G Shiha; S Seif; A Eldesoky; M Elbasiony; R Soliman; A Metwally; K Zalata; N Mikhail
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 4.  Paediatric chronic liver diseases: how to investigate and follow up? Role of imaging in the diagnosis of fibrosis.

Authors:  Danièle Pariente; Stéphanie Franchi-Abella
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

5.  Physicians' practices for diagnosing liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases: a nationwide, Canadian survey.

Authors:  Giada Sebastiani; Peter Ghali; Phil Wong; Marina B Klein; Marc Deschenes; Robert P Myers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-01

6.  Early termination of immune tolerance state of hepatitis B virus infection explains liver damage.

Authors:  Sheikh Mohammad Fazle Akbar; Helal Uddin; Sakirul Islam Khan; Salimur Rahman
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-27

Review 7.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jerome Byam; John Renz; J Michael Millis
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 8.  Fibrosis assessment: impact on current management of chronic liver disease and application of quantitative invasive tools.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Jin-Lin Hou
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 6.047

9.  Givinostat inhibition of hepatic stellate cell proliferation and protein acetylation.

Authors:  Yu-Gang Wang; Ling Xu; Ting Wang; Jue Wei; Wen-Ying Meng; Na Wang; Min Shi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Advances in the Diagnosis of Human Schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Kosala G A D Weerakoon; Geoffrey N Gobert; Pengfei Cai; Donald P McManus
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.