Literature DB >> 16698810

Chronic fatigue syndrome-like caseness as a predictor of work status in fatigued employees on sick leave: four year follow up study.

M J H Huibers1, S S Leone, I J Kant, J A Knottnerus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether CFS-like caseness (meeting the criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)) predicts work status in the long term.
METHODS: Prospective study in a sample of fatigued employees absent from work. Data were collected at baseline and four years later, and included CFS-like caseness and work status (inactive work status and full work incapacity).
RESULTS: CFS-like cases at baseline were three times more likely to be unable to work at follow up than fatigued employees who did not meet CFS criteria at baseline (ORs 3-3.3). These associations grew even stronger when demographic and clinical confounders were controlled for (ORs 3.4-4.4).
CONCLUSION: A CFS-like status (compared to non-CFS fatigue) proved to be a strong predictor of an inactive work status and full work incapacity in the long term. Since little is known about effective interventions that prevent absenteeism and work incapacity or facilitate return to work in subjects with chronic fatigue, there is a great need for powerful early interventions that restore or preserve the ability to work, especially for workers who meet criteria for CFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16698810      PMCID: PMC2078121          DOI: 10.1136/oem.2005.023176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  12 in total

1.  Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome-like caseness in the working population: results from the Maastricht cohort study.

Authors:  M J H Huibers; I J Kant; G M H Swaen; S V Kasl
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group.

Authors:  K Fukuda; S E Straus; I Hickie; M C Sharpe; J G Dobbins; A Komaroff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J B Prins; G Bleijenberg; E Bazelmans; L D Elving; T M de Boo; J L Severens; G J van der Wilt; P Spinhoven; J W van der Meer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Factors influencing the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Laura Solomon; William C Reeves
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-08

6.  Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure.

Authors:  A J Beurskens; U Bültmann; I Kant; J H Vercoulen; G Bleijenberg; G M Swaen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 7.  A systematic review describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  R Cairns; M Hotopf
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.611

8.  Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy by general practitioners for unexplained fatigue among employees: Randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcus J H Huibers; Anna J H M Beurskens; Constant P Van Schayck; Ellen Bazelmans; Job F M Metsemakers; J Andre Knottnerus; Gijs Bleijenberg
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 9.  Disability and chronic fatigue syndrome: a focus on function.

Authors:  Susan D Ross; Rhonda P Estok; Diana Frame; Linda R Stone; Veronica Ludensky; Cindy B Levine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

Review 10.  Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Niloofar Afari; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  2 in total

1.  We are not all coping: a cross-sectional investigation of resilience in the dementia care workforce.

Authors:  Kate-Ellen J Elliott; Christine M Stirling; Angela J Martin; Andrew L Robinson; Jennifer L Scott
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  What workers can tell us about post-COVID workability.

Authors:  J Lunt; S Hemming; K Burton; J Elander; A Baraniak
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.629

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.