Laura Solomon1, William C Reeves. 1. Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most of what is believed about chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is based on clinic-based studies. These studies may not reflect CFS cases in the population. METHODS: We used data from a population-based study of CFS to identify factors associated with receiving a CFS diagnosis. Wichita, Kan, residents were screened by random-digit dialing. Eligible individuals completed a telephone interview. Respondents meeting CFS criteria were invited for a clinical evaluation to confirm CFS. We analyzed all persons with confirmed CFS. The main outcomes of this study, prevalence and incidence of CFS, are published elsewhere. Herein, we present an exploratory analysis with previous CFS diagnosis as the outcome, predicted by demographic and symptom characteristics. RESULTS: We confirmed CFS in 90 subjects; 14 (16%) had been previously diagnosed as having CFS. Persons in the middle- vs the higher-income group were more likely to have been diagnosed as having CFS (9 [29%] of 31 subjects vs 3 [8%] of 39 subjects; P = .03), as were those with sudden vs gradual fatigue onset (7 [41%] of 17 subjects vs 4 [6%] of 64 subjects; P < .01), those reporting tender lymph nodes (7 [33%] of 21 subjects vs 7 [10%] of 69 subjects; P = .02), and those reporting a sore throat (6 [35%] of 17 subjects vs 8 [11%] of 73 subjects; P = .02). Only 17 (21%) of 81 subjects had sudden fatigue onset, and tender lymph nodes (reported in 21 [23%] of 90 subjects) and a sore throat (reported in 17 [19%] of 90 subjects) were the least common symptoms. CONCLUSION: Most cases of CFS in the population are unrecognized by the medical community; persons diagnosed as having CFS may be different from persons with CFS in the general population.
BACKGROUND: Most of what is believed about chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is based on clinic-based studies. These studies may not reflect CFS cases in the population. METHODS: We used data from a population-based study of CFS to identify factors associated with receiving a CFS diagnosis. Wichita, Kan, residents were screened by random-digit dialing. Eligible individuals completed a telephone interview. Respondents meeting CFS criteria were invited for a clinical evaluation to confirm CFS. We analyzed all persons with confirmed CFS. The main outcomes of this study, prevalence and incidence of CFS, are published elsewhere. Herein, we present an exploratory analysis with previous CFS diagnosis as the outcome, predicted by demographic and symptom characteristics. RESULTS: We confirmed CFS in 90 subjects; 14 (16%) had been previously diagnosed as having CFS. Persons in the middle- vs the higher-income group were more likely to have been diagnosed as having CFS (9 [29%] of 31 subjects vs 3 [8%] of 39 subjects; P = .03), as were those with sudden vs gradual fatigue onset (7 [41%] of 17 subjects vs 4 [6%] of 64 subjects; P < .01), those reporting tender lymph nodes (7 [33%] of 21 subjects vs 7 [10%] of 69 subjects; P = .02), and those reporting a sore throat (6 [35%] of 17 subjects vs 8 [11%] of 73 subjects; P = .02). Only 17 (21%) of 81 subjects had sudden fatigue onset, and tender lymph nodes (reported in 21 [23%] of 90 subjects) and a sore throat (reported in 17 [19%] of 90 subjects) were the least common symptoms. CONCLUSION: Most cases of CFS in the population are unrecognized by the medical community; persons diagnosed as having CFS may be different from persons with CFS in the general population.
Authors: Ann Vincent; Dana J Brimmer; Mary O Whipple; James F Jones; Roumiana Boneva; Brian D Lahr; Elizabeth Maloney; Jennifer L St Sauver; William C Reeves Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Suzanne D Vernon; Sherlyn Funk; Lucinda Bateman; Gregory J Stoddard; Sarah Hammer; Karen Sullivan; Jennifer Bell; Saeed Abbaszadeh; W Ian Lipkin; Anthony L Komaroff Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Hao Tian; Dana J Brimmer; Jin-Mann S Lin; Abbigail J Tumpey; William C Reeves Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Urs M Nater; James F Jones; Jin-Mann S Lin; Elizabeth Maloney; William C Reeves; Christine Heim Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Ma Del Carmen Ubago Linares; Isabel Ruiz-Pérez; Ma José Bermejo Pérez; Antonio Olry de Labry-Lima; Elisa Hernández-Torres; Juncal Plazaola-Castaño Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Jin-Mann S Lin; Dana J Brimmer; Roumiana S Boneva; James F Jones; William C Reeves Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 2.655