Literature DB >> 16697749

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Douglas K Rex1, Charles J Kahi, Bernard Levin, Robert A Smith, John H Bond, Durado Brooks, Randall W Burt, Tim Byers, Robert H Fletcher, Neil Hyman, David Johnson, Lynne Kirk, David A Lieberman, Theodore R Levin, Michael J O'Brien, Clifford Simmang, Alan G Thorson, Sidney J Winawer.   

Abstract

Patients with resected colorectal cancer are at risk for recurrent cancer and metachronous neoplasms in the colon. This joint update of guidelines by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer addresses only the use of endoscopy in the surveillance of these patients. Patients with endoscopically resected Stage I colorectal cancer, surgically resected Stages II and III cancers, and Stage IV cancer resected for cure (isolated hepatic or pulmonary metastasis) are candidates for endoscopic surveillance. The colorectum should be carefully cleared of synchronous neoplasia in the perioperative period. In nonobstructed colons, colonoscopy should be performed preoperatively. In obstructed colons, double-contrast barium enema or computed tomography colonography should be performed preoperatively, and colonoscopy should be performed 3 to 6 months after surgery. These steps complete the process of clearing synchronous disease. After clearing for synchronous disease, another colonoscopy should be performed in 1 year to look for metachronous lesions. This recommendation is based on reports of a high incidence of apparently metachronous second cancers in the first 2 years after resection. If the examination at 1 year is normal, then the interval before the next subsequent examination should be 3 years. If that examination is normal, then the interval before the next subsequent examination should be 5 years. Shorter intervals may be indicated by associated adenoma findings (see "Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society"). Shorter intervals also are indicated if the patient's age, family history, or tumor testing indicate definite or probable hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Patients undergoing low anterior resection of rectal cancer generally have higher rates of local cancer recurrence compared with those with colon cancer. Although effectiveness is not proven, performance of endoscopic ultrasound or flexible sigmoidoscopy at 3- to 6-month intervals for the first 2 years after resection can be considered for the purpose of detecting a surgically curable recurrence of the original rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697749     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  75 in total

1.  Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.

Authors:  Heba Iskandar; Yan Yan; Jill Elwing; Dayna Early; Graham A Colditz; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Factors affecting colonoscope insertion time in patients with or without a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Yoon Nam Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer 2013.

Authors:  J Maurel; C Grávalos; F Rivera; R Vera; E González Flores
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.

Authors:  Yinglong Huang; Wei Gong; Bingzhong Su; Fachao Zhi; Side Liu; Yang Bai; Bo Jiang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  DNA demethylation in normal colon tissue predicts predisposition to multiple cancers.

Authors:  H Kamiyama; K Suzuki; T Maeda; K Koizumi; Y Miyaki; S Okada; Y J Kawamura; J K Samuelsson; S Alonso; F Konishi; M Perucho
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Grávalos Castro; Joan Maurel Santasusana; Fernando Rivera Herrero; Ramón Salazar Soler; Isabel Sevilla García; Javier Sastre Valera; José M Tabernero Caturla; Encarnación González Flores; María Lomas Garrido; Dolores Isla Casado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Colorectal cancer screening perceptions and practices: results from a national survey of gastroenterology, surgery and radiology trainees.

Authors:  Amy S Oxentenko; Robert A Vierkant; Darrell S Pardi; David R Farley; Eric J Dozois; Thomas E Hartman; David M Hough; Wesley O Petersen; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine Sharpe; John H Bond; Robert A Smith; Bernard Levin; John B Pope; Paul C Schroy; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer in young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer A Inra; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  An appendiceal neoplastic lesion: case report and implications for colonoscopic screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Hugh J Freeman; Douglas L Webber; Adam T Meneghetti
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines.

Authors:  Amanpal Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.