Literature DB >> 16697308

Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing.

Eraldo Occhetta1, Miriam Bortnik, Andrea Magnani, Gabriella Francalacci, Cristina Piccinino, Laura Plebani, Paolo Marino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, the safety, and hemodynamic improvements induced by permanent para-Hisian pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and narrow QRS who underwent atrioventricular (AV) node ablation.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular apical pacing, inducing asynchronous ventricular contraction, may impair cardiac function; permanent para-Hisian pacing could preserve interventricular synchrony and improve left ventricular function.
METHODS: After AV node ablation, 16 patients were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker connected to a screw-in lead positioned in close proximity to the His bundle and to a right ventricular apical lead. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and after two randomized six-month periods (with para-Hisian and conventional pacing).
RESULTS: During para-Hisian pacing, the interventricular electromechanical delay improved as well (34 +/- 18 ms) as during right apical pacing (47 +/- 19 ms), p < 0.05. Para-Hisian pacing allowed an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class (1.75 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.6 at baseline and 2.5 +/- 0.4 during apical pacing, p < 0.05 for both), in quality-of-life score (16.2 +/- 8.7 vs. 32.5 +/- 15.0 at baseline, p < 0.05), and in the 6-min walk test (431 +/- 73 m vs. 378 +/- 60 m at baseline and 360 +/- 71 m during apical pacing, p < 0.5 for both). Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation improved during para-Hisian pacing (1.22 +/- 0.8 and 1.46 +/- 0.5 index, respectively, vs. 1.68 +/- 0.6 [p < 0.05] and 1.62 +/- 0.7 [p = NS] index at baseline, respectively), with a slight worsening during apical pacing (1.93 +/- 1 and 1.93 +/- 0.7 index, respectively, p < 0.05 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: Permanent para-Hisian pacing is feasible and safe. Compared with conventional right apical pacing, it allows an improvement in functional and hemodynamic parameters over long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697308     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  45 in total

1.  Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-07

2.  Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing. An intrapatient acute comparison study.

Authors:  Domenico Catanzariti; Massimiliano Maines; Claudio Cemin; Gianpaolo Broso; Tiziana Marotta; Giuseppe Vergara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Future easy and physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-26

Review 4.  Direct His bundle and paraHisian cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; S S Barold
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

6.  Selective site pacing: rationale and practical application.

Authors:  Sameer Parekh; Kenneth M Stein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  [Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

Review 8.  The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Finn Akerström; Miguel A Arias; Marta Pachón; Jesús Jiménez-López; Alberto Puchol; Justo Juliá-Calvo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-26

9.  Paced QRS axis as a predictor of pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Kim; Yong-Seog Oh; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; Jae Seok Park; Sang Weon Park; Seung-Jung Park; Young Keun On; June Soo Kim; Woo-Seung Shin; Ji-Hoon Kim; Sung-Won Jang; Man Young Lee; You-Ho Kim; Tai-Ho Rho
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Atrioventricular Nodal Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Congestive Heart Failure.

Authors:  Osmar Antonio Centurión; Karina Elizabeth Scavenius; Laura B García; Luis Miño; Judith Torales; Orlando Sequeira
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.