Literature DB >> 25380704

Paced QRS axis as a predictor of pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction.

Sung-Hwan Kim1, Yong-Seog Oh, Gi-Byoung Nam, Kee-Joon Choi, Jae Seok Park, Sang Weon Park, Seung-Jung Park, Young Keun On, June Soo Kim, Woo-Seung Shin, Ji-Hoon Kim, Sung-Won Jang, Man Young Lee, You-Ho Kim, Tai-Ho Rho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The selection of the optimal right ventricular (RV) pacing site remains unclear. We hypothesized that a normal paced QRS axis would provide a physiological ventricular activation and lead to a better long-term outcome.
METHODS: We evaluated 187 patients who underwent a permanent pacemaker implantation and were dependent on RV pacing. The pacing sites were classified as the apex and non-apex according to the chest radiography. A paced QRS axis was defined as that between -30° and 90°. Preservation of the left ventricular (LV) systolic function was defined as that with a <10 % decrease in the ejection fraction after the pacemaker implantation.
RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 5.8 years (interquartile 3.9-9.0). Radiographically, the RV leads were located in the apex (n = 148, 79 %) or non-apex (n = 39, 21 %). In the electrocardiogram, normal paced and abnormal paced QRS axes were observed in 28 patients (15 %) and 159 patients (85 %), respectively. The LV ejection fraction was decreased in the patients with an abnormal paced QRS axis (-10 ± 10 %, P < 0.001), but not in those with a normal axis (0 ± 6 %, P = 0.80). The electrocardiographic determinant differentiated a preserved LV function (95 % vs. 35 %, log-rank P = 0.04). Among the patients with radiographically non-apical pacing, a normal paced QRS axis was an additional meaningful predictor of a preserved LV function after the pacemaker implantation (95 % vs. 24 %, log-rank P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Compared with the radiographic method, a normal paced QRS axis was associated with a preserved LV function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380704     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-014-9950-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  28 in total

1.  Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping.

Authors:  Haran Burri; Chan-Il Park; Marc Zimmermann; Pascale Gentil-Baron; Carine Stettler; Henri Sunthorn; Giulia Domenichini; Dipen Shah
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Randy Lieberman; Luigi Padeletti; Jan Schreuder; Kenneth Jackson; Antonio Michelucci; Andrea Colella; William Eastman; Sergio Valsecchi; Douglas A Hettrick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Electrocardiographic algorithm to identify the optimal target ablation site for idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract ventricular premature contraction.

Authors:  Fengxiang Zhang; Minglong Chen; Bing Yang; Weizhu Ju; Hongwu Chen; Jian Yu; Chu-Pak Lau; Kejiang Cao; Hung-Fat Tse
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Pacing of the interventricular septum versus the right ventricular apex: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Giulia Domenichini; Henri Sunthorn; Eric Fleury; Huberdine Foulkes; Carine Stettler; Haran Burri
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.487

6.  A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results.

Authors:  Frederic Victor; Philippe Mabo; Hassan Mansour; Dominique Pavin; Guillaume Kabalu; Christian de Place; Christophe Leclercq; J Claude Daubert
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03

7.  Electrocardiographic patterns of superior right ventricular outflow tract tachycardias: distinguishing septal and free-wall sites of origin.

Authors:  Sanjay Dixit; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01

8.  A comparison of ventricular function during high right ventricular septal and apical pacing after his-bundle ablation for refractory atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  F Mera; D B DeLurgio; R E Patterson; J D Merlino; M E Wade; A R León
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Long-term nonoutflow septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: relation to left ventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Panayota Flevari; Dionyssios Leftheriotis; Katerina Fountoulaki; Fotis Panou; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Ioannis Paraskevaidis; Dimitrios Th Kremastinos
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Utility of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in localizing the origin of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia.

Authors:  R L Jadonath; D S Schwartzman; M W Preminger; C D Gottlieb; F E Marchlinski
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reversal of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy by Normal QRS Axis Pacing.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Yang; Ju Youn Kim; Sung-Hwan Kim; Yong-Seog Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.243

2.  Three-dimensional echocardiography with left ventricular strain analyses helps earlier prediction of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  N M Sharath Babu; Sirish C Srinath; Anandaroop Lahiri; David Chase; Bobby John; John Roshan
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-12

3.  Evaluation of cardiac synchrony in left bundle branch pacing: Insights from echocardiographic research.

Authors:  Binni Cai; Xinyi Huang; Linlin Li; Jincun Guo; Simei Chen; Fanqi Meng; Huimin Wang; Biqin Lin; Maolong Su
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-20

4.  Left bundle branch potential predicts better electrical synchrony in bradycardia patients receiving left bundle branch pacing.

Authors:  Jingjuan Huang; Lina Guo; Weiwei Zhang; Ruogu Li; Ben He
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.174

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.