PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate whether the red marrow (RM) takes up (111)In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-D-Phe(1)-octreotide and (86)Y-DOTATOC and to assess the correlation between the RM absorbed doses and platelet count reduction as a biological dose estimate. METHODS: Data from 12 patients who underwent at 24 h p.i. high statistics (111)In single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and (86)Y positron emission tomography (PET) acquisitions of the chest were analysed. Uptake was measured on >7 cm spine length and converted to total RM uptake using standard RM distribution in man. RM absorbed doses were calculated assuming specific RM uptake and using the plasma and remainder of the body models. RM doses were correlated with the platelet count reduction at 4 weeks. In vitro experiments explored the metabolism of (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-octreotide and (90)Y-DOTATOC in plasma. RESULTS: The correlation between the uptake of both tracers was excellent (R = 0.80), indicating that RM uptake of (86)Y-DOTATOC reflects a real physiological process and not reconstruction artefacts. The kinetics of (86)Y-DOTATOC RM activity was different than that in blood and tumours, with no activity at 4 h p.i. indicating that the uptake is not somatostatin receptor dependent. In vitro experiments showed a transchelation of both radiometals to free transferrin that could explain the RM uptake. In patients without chemotherapy and with a normal platelet count recovery, a good correlation (R = 0.96) was found between the RM doses and the platelet count reduction at the nadir. CONCLUSION: These experimental facts support the existence of a true RM uptake likely related to transchelation of the radiometal to transferrin. RM uptake correlates well with the observed acute RM toxicity.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate whether the red marrow (RM) takes up (111)In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-D-Phe(1)-octreotide and (86)Y-DOTATOC and to assess the correlation between the RM absorbed doses and platelet count reduction as a biological dose estimate. METHODS: Data from 12 patients who underwent at 24 h p.i. high statistics (111)In single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and (86)Y positron emission tomography (PET) acquisitions of the chest were analysed. Uptake was measured on >7 cm spine length and converted to total RM uptake using standard RM distribution in man. RM absorbed doses were calculated assuming specific RM uptake and using the plasma and remainder of the body models. RM doses were correlated with the platelet count reduction at 4 weeks. In vitro experiments explored the metabolism of (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-octreotide and (90)Y-DOTATOC in plasma. RESULTS: The correlation between the uptake of both tracers was excellent (R = 0.80), indicating that RM uptake of (86)Y-DOTATOC reflects a real physiological process and not reconstruction artefacts. The kinetics of (86)Y-DOTATOC RM activity was different than that in blood and tumours, with no activity at 4 h p.i. indicating that the uptake is not somatostatin receptor dependent. In vitro experiments showed a transchelation of both radiometals to free transferrin that could explain the RM uptake. In patients without chemotherapy and with a normal platelet count recovery, a good correlation (R = 0.96) was found between the RM doses and the platelet count reduction at the nadir. CONCLUSION: These experimental facts support the existence of a true RM uptake likely related to transchelation of the radiometal to transferrin. RM uptake correlates well with the observed acute RM toxicity.
Authors: Sigrid P M A Oomen; Paula B van Hennik; Claudia Antonissen; Elgin G R Lichtenauer-Kaligis; Leo J Hofland; Steven W J Lamberts; Bob Löwenberg; Ivo P Touw Journal: Exp Hematol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Barry W Wessels; Mark W Konijnenberg; Roger G Dale; Hazel B Breitz; Marta Cremonesi; Ruby F Meredith; Alan J Green; Lionel G Bouchet; A Bertrand Brill; Wesley E Bolch; George Sgouros; Stephen R Thomas Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wouter A P Breeman; Katy van der Wansem; Bert F Bernard; Arthur van Gameren; Jack L Erion; Theo J Visser; Eric P Krenning; M de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-11-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Flavio Forrer; Eric P Krenning; Peter P Kooij; Bert F Bernard; Mark Konijnenberg; Willem H Bakker; Jaap J M Teunissen; Marion de Jong; Kirsten van Lom; Wouter W de Herder; Dik J Kwekkeboom Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sander M Bison; Mark W Konijnenberg; Marleen Melis; Stefan E Pool; Monique R Bernsen; Jaap J M Teunissen; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Marion de Jong Journal: Clin Transl Imaging Date: 2014-03-05
Authors: Stephan Walrand; Glenn D Flux; Mark W Konijnenberg; Roelf Valkema; Eric P Krenning; Renaud Lhommel; Stanislas Pauwels; Francois Jamar Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Lisa Bodei; Marta Cremonesi; Chiara M Grana; Marco Chinol; Silvia M Baio; Stefano Severi; Giovanni Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Giovanni Paganelli; Chiara M Grana; Ignat Drozdov; Marta Cremonesi; Christopher Lepensky; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Richard P Baum; Eric P Krenning; Irvin M Modlin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Deni Hardiansyah; Christian Maass; Ali Asgar Attarwala; Berthold Müller; Peter Kletting; Felix M Mottaghy; Gerhard Glatting Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 9.236