Literature DB >> 1669383

Laparoscopic appendectomy: three years' experience.

W B Saye1, D A Rives, E B Cochran.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed on 109 patients over a 3-year-period--1988 to 1991. All procedures were uneventful and all patients resumed normal activity within a shorter period than had been experienced with open appendectomy. Patients had a superior cosmetic result and experienced significantly less postoperative discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 1669383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc        ISSN： 1051-7200


  10 in total

Review 1.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis - Institutional experience.

Authors:  K R Geetha; Annappa Kudva
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication.

Authors:  T Geagea
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization?

Authors:  S L Schmitt; S M Cohen; S D Wexner; J J Nogueras; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  A Jain; P D Mercado; K P Grafton; R A Dorazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  L C Martin; I Puente; J L Sosa; A Bassin; R Breslaw; M G McKenney; E Ginzburg; D Sleeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic procedure for suspected appendicitis. A prospective study in 283 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J L Bouillot; S Salah; F Fernandez; G al-Hajj; N Dehni; J Dhote; A Badawy; J H Alexandre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Appendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras.

Authors:  D B Nguyen; W Silen; R A Hodin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  A comparison of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Authors:  M Tarnoff; U Atabek; M Goodman; J B Alexander; F Chrzanowski; K Mortman; R Camishon; M Pello
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.