Literature DB >> 9843606

Trends in bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

R M Walsh1, J M Henderson, D P Vogt, J T Mayes, S Grundfest-Broniatowski, M Gagner, J L Ponsky, R E Hermann.   

Abstract

Bile duct injuries are a serious complication of cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) were originally associated with an increased incidence of injuries. Patients referred to a tertiary center were reviewed to assess the trends in the number, presentation, and management. Seventy-three patients were referred over a 6-year period with a maximum of 17 patients referred in 1992, but the number has not declined substantially over time. The persistent number of referrals is a consequence of ongoing injuries. One third of injuries were diagnosed at LC, and the use of cholangiography has not increased. The number of cystic duct leaks has not decreased and they represent 25% of all cases. The level of injury has remained unchanged with Bismuth types I and II in 37% and types III and IV in 38%. Excluding patients with cystic duct leaks, 58% were referred after a failed ductal repair. Definitive treatment with biliary stenting was successful in 37%, and 34 patients (47%) required a biliary-enteric anastomosis. Complications occurred in 18 patients (25%) including seven with postoperative stricture or cholangitis. No biliary reoperations have been performed at a mean follow-up of 36 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9843606     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80037-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Benign biliary strictures: an analytic review (1970 to 1984).

Authors:  J F Genest; E Nanos; S Grundfest-Broniatowski; D Vogt; R E Hermann
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Risk factors for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 49 cases.

Authors:  F P Schol; P M Go; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster.

Authors:  S J Savader; K D Lillemoe; C A Prescott; A B Winick; A C Venbrux; G B Lund; S E Mitchell; J L Cameron; F A Osterman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of bile duct pressures following sphincterotomy and endobiliary stenting in a canine model.

Authors:  D F Youngelman; J M Marks; T Ponsky; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Intraoperative cholangiography is not essential to avoid duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J W Lorimer; R J Fairfull-Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The improving results of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Pickleman; R P González
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-08

9.  Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  J C Russell; S J Walsh; A S Mattie; J T Lynch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-04

10.  Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; M W Flye; L M Brunt; P T Stockmann; G A Sicard; D Picus; S A Edmundowicz; G Aliperti
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  12 in total

1.  Bile duct injuries 12 years after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  William C Chapman; Michael Abecassis; William Jarnagin; Sean Mulvihill; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Relaparoscopy as an alternative to laparotomy for laparoscopic complications].

Authors:  I Leister; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury.

Authors:  Philip R de Reuver; Irene Grossmann; Olivier R Busch; Huug Obertop; Thomas M van Gulik; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Biliary tract injuries after lap cholecystectomy-types, surgical intervention and timing.

Authors:  Michail Karanikas; Ferdi Bozali; Vasileia Vamvakerou; Markos Markou; Zeinep Tzoutze Memet Chasan; Eleni Efraimidou; Theodossis S Papavramidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

7.  Medicolegal costs of bile duct injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pankaj G Roy; Zahir F Soonawalla; Hugh W Grant
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Retained gallbladder/cystic duct remnant calculi as a cause of postcholecystectomy pain.

Authors:  R M Walsh; J L Ponsky; J Dumot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Specialist outreach service for on-table repair of iatrogenic bile duct injuries--a new kind of 'travelling surgeon'.

Authors:  M A Silva; C Coldham; A D Mayer; S R Bramhall; J A C Buckels; D F Mirza
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the "critical view of safety" technique.

Authors:  C Avgerinos; D Kelgiorgi; Z Touloumis; L Baltatzi; C Dervenis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.