Literature DB >> 8694938

The role of preoperative investigations in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Results in 200 consecutive cases.

D Urbano1, R Di Nardo, P De Simone, M Rossi, D Alfani, R Cortesini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When we began laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) we set up a strict preoperative workup in order to assess whether currently available investigations could help predict difficult laparoscopic procedures.
METHODS: Reported here are the results of a prospective trial carried out in our first 200 consecutive patients, who underwent routine intravenous cholangiography (IVC), abdominal ultrasound scan (US), blood tests-namely, markers of biliary stasis (MBS)-and preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in case of clinically suspected common bile duct stones (CBDS).
RESULTS: On the basis of our experience we think that the US findings relate to the difficulty of the laparoscopic procedure more closely than the other preoperative investigations, and the association of US and liver chemistry provides an accurate evaluation of biliary stones.
CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with data emerging from the literature, the preoperative investigations do not seem to be useful in predicting biliary and vascular complications, whose prevention lies in the adoption of correct surgical technique and a low threshold for conversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8694938     DOI: 10.1007/bf00189534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures.

Authors:  A T Spaw; E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

2.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: historic perspective and personal experience.

Authors:  F Dubois; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

Review 4.  Complications of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  D W Crist; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  To ERCP or not to ERCP? That is the question.

Authors:  A S Fink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  [Severe complications after cholecystectomy by celioscopy: lessons from yesterday and today].

Authors:  S Evrard; R F Dondelinger; D Mutter; M Vix; L Mendoza-Burgos; J Marescaux
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  1993-05

7.  Spectrum and management of major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Ress; M G Sarr; D M Nagorney; M B Farnell; J H Donohue; D C McIlrath
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  A prospective cohort study for prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Veselin Stanisic; Miroslav Milicevic; Nikola Kocev; Balsa Stanisic
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.