Literature DB >> 7500444

Sentinel lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

C A Pettaway1, L L Pisters, C P Dinney, F Jularbal, D A Swanson, A C von Eschenbach, A Ayala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined whether an extended sentinel lymph node dissection is effective for staging penile squamous carcinoma associated with clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was done of 20 consecutive patients who underwent extended sentinel lymph node dissection between 1985 and 1994.
RESULTS: Of the patients 14 underwent bilateral extended sentinel lymph node dissection, and 6 underwent ipsilateral extended sentinel lymph node dissection plus contralateral inguinal or ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy. All lymph nodes included in the extended sentinel node dissection were negative for metastases. Five patients had inguinal metastases at a median of 10 months (range 3 to 21) after negative extended sentinel lymph node dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: Although it is a more extensive procedure than sentinel lymph node biopsy, extended sentinel lymph node dissection is still associated with a significant false-negative rate (25%). Thus, its routine use can no longer be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7500444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

1.  Histopathological workup of sentinel lymph nodes: how much is enough?

Authors:  P J van Diest
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  [The significance of inguinal lymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the penis].

Authors:  E Preis; G Jakse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Penile cancer: a case for guidelines.

Authors:  N P Munro; P J Thomas; G P Deutsch; N J Hodson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  [Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of the genitourinary tract].

Authors:  S Bertz; B J Schmitz-Dräger; C Protzel; A Hartmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  Advanced penile cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan E Heinlen; David D Buethe; Daniel Joseph Culkin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Feasibility of performing dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as a delayed procedure in penile cancer.

Authors:  Savvas Omorphos; Zia Saad; Manit Arya; Alex Freeman; Peter Malone; Raj Nigam; Jamshed Bomanji; Asif Muneer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Lymphoscintigraphy in penile cancer: limited value of sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes.

Authors:  E Hungerhuber; B Schlenker; D Frimberger; R Linke; A Karl; C G Stief; P Schneede
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  What next? Managing lymph nodes in men with penile cancer.

Authors:  Michael Leveridge; D Robert Siemens; Christopher Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Extra-anatomical transobturator bypass graft for femoral artery involvement by metastatic carcinoma of the penis: report of five patients.

Authors:  Ubirajara Ferreira; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Lia Yumi Ikari; Walter da Silva; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Fernandes Denardi; Rafael Mamprim Stopiglia; Fábio Husseman Menezes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.