OBJECTIVES: To produce a universally accepted waiting time definition for cardiovascular surgery, present the rationale for this definition, and compare data on current waiting times in British Columbia based on this definition versus the current definition in patients waiting for aortic stenosis surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The present study is a retrospective data analysis. SETTING: The fixed-dollar, single-payer health care delivery system in British Columbia. PATIENTS: All residents of British Columbia who were at least 22 years of age and who were placed on a waiting list for aortic valve surgery with the diagnosis of aortic stenosis between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, were eligible for the present study. INTERVENTIONS: Dates of physician visits, procedures and surgery were obtained from the British Columbia Cardiac Registries and Medical Services Plan databases. True waiting times from physician visits to procedures and surgery were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 2516 patients booked for aortic valve surgery with a primary diagnosis of aortic stenosis, 2237 subjects (88.9%) were eligible for analysis after exclusions. The eligible patients ranged in age from 22 to 95 years, and 36.8% were female. The true median waiting time was 243 days (148 days [25th percentile], 397 days [75th percentile]), which was 3.2 times the interval currently reported as the waiting time (75 days [42, 127]). Thirty-nine patients died while waiting for surgery. Patients used more resources while waiting for surgery than after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: True waiting times for surgery for aortic stenosis in British Columbia are significantly longer than reported waiting times. The authors propose that the wait list time for cardiovascular surgery be redefined as "the time interval between the patient's first contact with a medical care provider with symptoms or signs which ultimately lead to cardiovascular surgery and the date of that surgery".
OBJECTIVES: To produce a universally accepted waiting time definition for cardiovascular surgery, present the rationale for this definition, and compare data on current waiting times in British Columbia based on this definition versus the current definition in patients waiting for aortic stenosis surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The present study is a retrospective data analysis. SETTING: The fixed-dollar, single-payer health care delivery system in British Columbia. PATIENTS: All residents of British Columbia who were at least 22 years of age and who were placed on a waiting list for aortic valve surgery with the diagnosis of aortic stenosis between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, were eligible for the present study. INTERVENTIONS: Dates of physician visits, procedures and surgery were obtained from the British Columbia Cardiac Registries and Medical Services Plan databases. True waiting times from physician visits to procedures and surgery were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 2516 patients booked for aortic valve surgery with a primary diagnosis of aortic stenosis, 2237 subjects (88.9%) were eligible for analysis after exclusions. The eligible patients ranged in age from 22 to 95 years, and 36.8% were female. The true median waiting time was 243 days (148 days [25th percentile], 397 days [75th percentile]), which was 3.2 times the interval currently reported as the waiting time (75 days [42, 127]). Thirty-nine patients died while waiting for surgery. Patients used more resources while waiting for surgery than after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: True waiting times for surgery for aortic stenosis in British Columbia are significantly longer than reported waiting times. The authors propose that the wait list time for cardiovascular surgery be redefined as "the time interval between the patient's first contact with a medical care provider with symptoms or signs which ultimately lead to cardiovascular surgery and the date of that surgery".
Authors: J Plomp; W K Redekop; F W Dekker; T R van Geldorp; M M Haalebos; G Jambroes; J H Kingma; F Zijlstra; J G Tijssen Journal: Heart Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: C D Naylor; R S Baigrie; B S Goldman; J A Cairns; D S Beanlands; N Berman; D Borts; D H Fitchett; A Haq; A Hess Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 1991-06 Impact factor: 5.223