Literature DB >> 20101361

How established wait time benchmarks significantly underestimate total wait times for cardiac surgery.

Jean-Francois Legare1, D Li, K J Buth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wait times for cardiac surgery are well established but may not reflect the total wait time patients experience.
METHODS: The Maritime Heart Center (Halifax, Nova Scotia) cardiac surgery database was used to identify all consecutive patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 2002 and 2005 from a single urgency queue. The provincial physician billing database provided a timeline record of dates, physician visits, and diagnoses or procedures performed for each patient. This information was used to assess total and component wait times leading to cardiac surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 705 consecutive patients were included and stratified based on geographical location: urban Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM; n=222), urban non-HRM (n=220) and rural (n=263). Patients from all regions did not differ in age, sex, comorbidities or ventricular function. Using a traditional definition of wait time (time listed), patients waited a median of 56 days (interquartile range [IQR] 38 to 77 days). In comparison, the total wait times based on the time from presentation to surgery were a median of 109 days (IQR 56 to 184 days) for HRM, a median of 121 days (IQR 77 to 184 days) for urban non-HRM and a median of 123 days (IQR 79 to 169 days) for rural patients (P-value nonsignificant). Two modes of presentation emerged that were not influenced by a patient's geographical location. Patients who presented to the emergency department (n=229) waited a median of 73 days. This was significantly less than patients who presented to their family physician (n=476), who waited a median of 135 days (P<0.001). The difference in overall wait for patients presenting to the emergency room was a result of a shorter wait time for referral to a specialist and from seeing a specialist to catheterization.
CONCLUSION: The present pilot study demonstrated that total patient wait times for cardiac care and surgery in Nova Scotia are significantly longer (more than twofold) than traditionally reported wait times for surgery alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20101361      PMCID: PMC2827229          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70337-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  11 in total

1.  Waiting for cardiac surgery: results of a risk-stratified queuing process.

Authors:  A A Ray; K J Buth; J A Sullivan; D E Johnstone; G M Hirsch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  In search of 'truth' and standards for reporting cardiac procedure waiting times.

Authors:  William A Ghali; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Universal access -- but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to electrophysiology services in Canada.

Authors:  Christopher S Simpson; Jeffrey S Healey; Francois Philippon; Paul Dorian; L Brent Mitchell; John L Sapp; Blair J O'Neill; Marcella M Sholdice; Martin S Green; Larry D Sterns; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  True versus reported waiting times for valvular aortic stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Brad I Munt; Karin H Humphries; Min Gao; Robert R Moss; Christopher R Thompson
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 5.  Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Michelle M Graham; Merril L Knudtson; Blair J O'Neill; David B Ross
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Managed delay for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the experience at one Canadian center.

Authors:  J L Cox; J F Petrie; P T Pollak; D E Johnstone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Treating the right patient at the right time: access to specialist consultation and non-invasive testing.

Authors:  Merril L Knudtson; Rob Beanlands; James M Brophy; Lyall Higginson; Brad Munt; John Rottger
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Same-day booking: success in a Canadian family practice.

Authors:  Victoria Mitchell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  The risk of death associated with delayed coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Boris G Sobolev; Adrian R Levy; Lisa Kuramoto; Robert Hayden; James M Brophy; J Mark FitzGerald
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Time on wait lists for coronary bypass surgery in British Columbia, Canada, 1991-2000.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Boris G Sobolev; Robert Hayden; Michael Kiely; J Mark Fitzgerald; Martin T Schechter
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Still waiting after all these years.

Authors:  C S Simpson
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  What are wait times to see a specialist? an analysis of 26,942 referrals in southwestern Ontario.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Moira Stewart; Douglas Manuel; Tom Freeman; Amanda Terry; Vijaya Chevendra; Heather Maddocks; Neil Marshall
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-08

3.  Beyond "medical tourism": Canadian companies marketing medical travel.

Authors:  Leigh Turner
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.185

4.  The occurrence of adverse events in relation to time after registration for coronary artery bypass surgery: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  Boris G Sobolev; Guy Fradet; Lisa Kuramoto; Basia Rogula
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.