Literature DB >> 16675820

Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways.

Patrick M Bossuyt1, Les Irwig, Jonathan Craig, Paul Glasziou.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16675820      PMCID： PMC1458557          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient.

Authors:  P M Bossuyt; J G Lijmer; B W Mol
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-11-25       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Laboratory-related outcomes in healthcare.

Authors:  D E Bruns
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Sample size calculations for comparative studies of medical tests for detecting presence of disease.

Authors:  Todd A Alonzo; Margaret S Pepe; Chaya S Moskowitz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  J André Knottnerus; Chris van Weel; Jean W M Muris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-23

Review 5.  Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Patrick Bossuyt; Paul Glasziou; Constantine Gatsonis; Jeroen Lijmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

6.  Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Petra Macaskill; Stephen D Walter; Les Irwig; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.

Authors:  T C Wright; L Denny; L Kuhn; A Pollack; A Lorincz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography.

Authors:  Arne van Belle; Harry R Büller; Menno V Huisman; Peter M Huisman; Karin Kaasjager; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Mark H H Kramer; Marieke J H A Kruip; Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp; Frank W G Leebeek; Mathilde Nijkeuter; Martin H Prins; Maaike Sohne; Lidwine W Tick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

Review 10.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391
View more
  97 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Susan Mallett; Stuart A Taylor; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Design-related bias in estimates of accuracy when comparing imaging tests: examples from breast imaging research.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Chip Wade; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

4.  Bridging the gaps in evidence based diagnosis.

Authors:  Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-26

5.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy and the Cochrane collaboration.

Authors:  Gianni Virgili; Andrea A Conti; Vittoria Murro; Gian Franco Gensini; Roberto Gusinu
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.

Authors:  B Rud; J Hilden; L Hyldstrup; A Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Kirkham; Manit Arya; Rowland Illing; Alex Freeman; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Evidence-based laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Tony Badrick
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2013-08

9.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; A Holger J Schünemann; Andrew D Oxman; Jan Brozek; Paul Glasziou; Roman Jaeschke; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Regina Kunz; Jonathan Craig; Victor M Montori; Patrick Bossuyt; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-17

10.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan J Deeks; Constantine Gatsonis; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.