Literature DB >> 16664916

Stomatal responses to light and leaf-air water vapor pressure difference show similar kinetics in sugarcane and soybean.

D A Grantz1, E Zeiger.   

Abstract

Stomatal responses to light and humidity (vapor pressure difference, VPD) are important determinants of stomatal conductance. Stomatal movements induced by light are the result of a transduction of the light stimulus into modulated ion fluxes in guard cells and concomitant osmotic adjustments and turgor changes. It is generally assumed that this transduction process is a general stomatal property, with different environmental stimuli integrated into guard cell metabolism through their modulation of ion fluxes. In contrast with this notion, the VPD response, which is unique because both its triggering signal and the turgor changes required for aperture modulations involve water molecules, has been considered to be hydropassive and thus independent of guard cell metabolism. We used a kinetic approach to compare the light and VPD responses in order to test the hypothesis that hydropassive changes in guard cell turgor could be faster than the metabolism-dependent light responses. Changes in stomatal conductance in intact leaves of sugarcane and soybean were measured after application of step changes in VPD and in light. In spite of a 5-fold difference in overall rates between the two species, the response rates following light or VPD steps were similar. Although a coincidental kinetic similarity between two mechanistically different responses cannot be ruled out, the data suggest a common mechanism controlling stomatal movements, with the VPD stimulus inducing metabolic modulations of ion fluxes analogous to other stomatal responses.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 16664916      PMCID: PMC1075441          DOI: 10.1104/pp.81.3.865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  2 in total

1.  Kinetic properties of the blue-light response of stomata.

Authors:  M Iino; T Ogawa; E Zeiger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of Light Quality on Stomatal Opening in Leaves of Xanthium strumarium L.

Authors:  T D Sharkey; K Raschke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 8.340

  2 in total
  14 in total

1.  Comparison of K(+)-channel activation and deactivation in guard cells from a dicotyledon (Vicia faba L.) and a graminaceous monocotyledon (Zea mays).

Authors:  K A Fairley-Grenot; S M Assmann
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  The role of bundle sheath extensions and life form in stomatal responses to leaf water status.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley; Lawren Sack; Matthew E Gilbert
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Modeling Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Dynamic stomatal behavior and its role in carbon gain during lightflecks of a gap phase and an understory Piper species acclimated to high and low light.

Authors:  Clara Tinoco-Ojanguren; Robert W Pearcy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species : I. VPD effects on the transient stomatal response to lightflecks.

Authors:  Clara Tinoco-Ojanguren; Robert W Pearcy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Stomatal and photosynthetic responses during sun/shade transitions in subalpine plants: influence on water use efficiency.

Authors:  A K Knapp; W K Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The magnitude of the stomatal response to blue light : modulation by atmospheric humidity.

Authors:  S M Assmann; D A Grantz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Dependence of the Extent and Direction of Average Stomatal Response in Zea mays L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. on the Frequency of Fluctuations in Environmental Stimuli.

Authors:  Z. G. Cardon; J. A. Berry; I. E. Woodrow
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Measurement of the Leakage of CO2 from Bundle-Sheath Cells of Leaves during C4 Photosynthesis.

Authors:  M. D. Hatch; A. Agostino; CLD. Jenkins
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Guard cells of Commelina communis L. do not respond metabolically to osmotic stress in isolated epidermis: Implications for stomatal responses to drought and humidity.

Authors:  D A Grantz; A Schwartz
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.