Literature DB >> 12232261

Dependence of the Extent and Direction of Average Stomatal Response in Zea mays L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. on the Frequency of Fluctuations in Environmental Stimuli.

Z. G. Cardon1, J. A. Berry, I. E. Woodrow.   

Abstract

Stomatal responses to fluctuating light and CO2 were investigated in Zea mays and Phaseolus vulgaris. Slow-moving stomata can affect carbon gain and water loss by plants during light flecks, under dynamic cloud cover, during alternating windy and calm air conditions (which influence CO2 concentrations and humidity immediately around leaves in plant canopies), at natural CO2 vents, or in growth chambers with imperfect CO2 control. It was found that the frequency of constant-amplitude fluctuations in light and CO2 dramatically affected the time-averaged stomatal conductance in both Zea and Phaseolus. During oscillations in light, average stomatal conductance was driven either above or below that observed at steady state at the average light level, depending on the frequency of the oscillations. Under oscillating CO2, the departure of average stomatal conductance away from that observed at steady state at the average CO2 level was also frequency dependent in both species. Upon cessation of oscillations and return of light or CO2 to the stable median level, stomatal conductance also returned to a steady state, matching that before oscillations were initiated. This work shows that fluctuations in light and CO2, and equally important, their frequency, can be critical in determining time-averaged stomatal conductance under unstable environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 12232261      PMCID: PMC160752          DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.3.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  2 in total

1.  Kinetic properties of the blue-light response of stomata.

Authors:  M Iino; T Ogawa; E Zeiger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stomatal responses to light and leaf-air water vapor pressure difference show similar kinetics in sugarcane and soybean.

Authors:  D A Grantz; E Zeiger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.340

  2 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Photosynthetic response to fluctuating environments and photoprotective strategies under abiotic stress.

Authors:  Wataru Yamori
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling.

Authors:  Tae-Houn Kim; Maik Böhmer; Honghong Hu; Noriyuki Nishimura; Julian I Schroeder
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 26.379

3.  Dynamics of Changing Intercellular CO2 Concentration (ci) during Drought and Determination of Minimum Functional ci.

Authors:  T. Brodribb
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Distinct Cellular Locations of Carbonic Anhydrases Mediate Carbon Dioxide Control of Stomatal Movements.

Authors:  Honghong Hu; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Rossana Occhipinti; Amber Ries; Maik Böhmer; Lei You; Chuanlei Xiao; Cawas B Engineer; Walter F Boron; Julian I Schroeder
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Photosynthetic CO2 uptake in seedlings of two tropical tree species exposed to oscillating elevated concentrations of CO2.

Authors:  Joseph A M Holtum; Klaus Winter
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Development of synchronized, autonomous, and self-regulated oscillations in transpiration rate of a whole tomato plant under water stress.

Authors:  Rony Wallach; Noam Da-Costa; Michael Raviv; Menachem Moshelion
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 7.  Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency.

Authors:  Tracy Lawson; Michael R Blatt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance.

Authors:  Paul L Drake; Ray H Froend; Peter J Franks
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.992

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.