Literature DB >> 21459977

The role of bundle sheath extensions and life form in stomatal responses to leaf water status.

Thomas N Buckley1, Lawren Sack, Matthew E Gilbert.   

Abstract

Bundle sheath extensions (BSEs) are key features of leaf structure with currently little-understood functions. To test the hypothesis that BSEs reduce the hydraulic resistance from the bundle sheath to the epidermis (r(be)) and thereby accelerate hydropassive stomatal movements, we compared stomatal responses with reduced humidity and leaf excision among 20 species with heterobaric or homobaric leaves and herbaceous or woody life forms. We hypothesized that low r(be) due to the presence of BSEs would increase the rate of stomatal opening (V) during transient wrong-way responses, but more so during wrong-way responses to excision (V(e)) than humidity (V(h)), thus increasing the ratio of V(e) to V(h). We predicted the same trends for herbaceous relative to woody species given greater hydraulic resistance in woody species. We found that V(e), V(h), and their ratio were 2.3 to 4.4 times greater in heterobaric than homobaric leaves and 2.0 to 3.1 times greater in herbaceous than woody species. To assess possible causes for these differences, we simulated these experiments in a dynamic compartment/resistance model, which predicted larger V(e) and V(e)/V(h) in leaves with smaller r(be). These results support the hypothesis that BSEs reduce r(be). Comparison of our data and simulations suggested that r(be) is approximately 4 to 16 times larger in homobaric than heterobaric leaves. Our study provides new evidence that variations in the distribution of hydraulic resistance within the leaf and plant are central to understanding dynamic stomatal responses to water status and their ecological correlates and that BSEs play several key roles in the functional ecology of heterobaric leaves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21459977      PMCID: PMC3177290          DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.175638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  27 in total

1.  A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature.

Authors:  David Peak; Keith A Mott
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 2.  The control of stomata by water balance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Dynamics of stomatal water relations following leaf excision.

Authors:  Julia E Powles; Thomas N Buckley; Adrienne B Nicotra; Graham D Farquhar
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  Short-term and long-term effects of plant water deficits on stomatal response to humidity in Corylus avellana L.

Authors:  E D Schulze; M Küppers
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  The rapid light response of leaf hydraulic conductance: new evidence from two experimental methods.

Authors:  Christine Scoffoni; Alícia Pou; Krõõt Aasamaa; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  Oscillations in stomatal conductance and plant functioning associated with stomatal conductance: Observations and a model.

Authors:  I R Cowan
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Passive origins of stomatal control in vascular plants.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; Scott A M McAdam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species.

Authors:  N C Turner; R A Spurway; E D Schulze
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Responses of transpiration and photosynthesis to reversible changes in photosynthetic foliage area in western red cedar (Thuja plicata) seedlings.

Authors:  S Pepin; N J Livingston; D Whitehead
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean.

Authors:  Thomas R Sinclair; Maciej A Zwieniecki; Noel Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.500

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Water transport, perception, and response in plants.

Authors:  Johannes Daniel Scharwies; José R Dinneny
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  Leaf Hydraulic Architecture and Stomatal Conductance: A Functional Perspective.

Authors:  Fulton E Rockwell; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Modeling Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Reversible Leaf Xylem Collapse: A Potential "Circuit Breaker" against Cavitation.

Authors:  Yong-Jiang Zhang; Fulton E Rockwell; Adam C Graham; Teressa Alexander; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  A Dynamic Hydro-Mechanical and Biochemical Model of Stomatal Conductance for C4 Photosynthesis.

Authors:  Chandra Bellasio; Joe Quirk; Thomas N Buckley; David J Beerling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment.

Authors:  Adam Wolf; William R L Anderegg; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Absorption of foliar-applied Zn in sunflower (Helianthus annuus): importance of the cuticle, stomata and trichomes.

Authors:  Cui Li; Peng Wang; Antony van der Ent; Miaomiao Cheng; Haibo Jiang; Thea Lund Read; Enzo Lombi; Caixian Tang; Martin D de Jonge; Neal W Menzies; Peter M Kopittke
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  The competition between liquid and vapor transport in transpiring leaves.

Authors:  Fulton Ewing Rockwell; N Michele Holbrook; Abraham Duncan Stroock
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  The grapevine root-specific aquaporin VvPIP2;4N controls root hydraulic conductance and leaf gas exchange under well-watered conditions but not under water stress.

Authors:  Irene Perrone; Giorgio Gambino; Walter Chitarra; Marco Vitali; Chiara Pagliarani; Nadia Riccomagno; Raffaella Balestrini; Ralf Kaldenhoff; Norbert Uehlein; Ivana Gribaudo; Andrea Schubert; Claudio Lovisolo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Bioimaging Techniques Reveal Foliar Phosphate Uptake Pathways and Leaf Phosphorus Status.

Authors:  Maja Arsic; Stine Le Tougaard; Daniel Pergament Persson; Helle Juel Martens; Casey L Doolette; Enzo Lombi; Jan Kofod Schjoerring; Søren Husted
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.