Literature DB >> 16661531

Comparative resistance of the soil and the plant to water transport.

W E Blizzard1.   

Abstract

The resistances to liquid water transport in the soil and plant were determined directly and simultaneously from measurements of soil, root, and leaf water potentials and the flux of water through the soil-plant system to the sites of evaporation in the leaf. For soybean (Merr.) transporting water at a steady rate, water potential differences between soil and root were smaller than between root and leaf over the range of soil water potentials from -0.2 to -11 bars. As soil water was depleted, water flow through the soil and plant decreased to one-tenth the maximum rate, but both the soil resistance and plant resistance increased. The plant resistance remained larger than the soil resistance over the entire range of soil water availability. Previous suggestions that the soil is the major resistance have ignored the increase in plant resistance and/or assumed root densities that were too low.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 16661531      PMCID: PMC440731          DOI: 10.1104/pp.66.5.809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  9 in total

1.  Recovery of photosynthesis in sunflower after a period of low leaf water potential.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  In situ measurement of root-water potential.

Authors:  E L Fiscus
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Diurnal variations in root diameter.

Authors:  M G Huck; B Klepper; H M Taylor
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Free-energy transfer in plants.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Isopiestic Technique for Measuring Leaf Water Potentials with a Thermocouple Psychrometer

Authors:  John S Boyer; Edward B Knipling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Water relations of pine seedlings in relation to root and shoot growth.

Authors:  M R Kaufmann
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Matric potentials of leaves.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Impedance to Water Movement in Soil and Plant.

Authors:  W R Gardner; C F Ehlig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  The Sites of Evaporation within Leaves.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley; Grace P John; Christine Scoffoni; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Response of liquid flow resistance to soil drying in seedlings of four deciduous angiosperms.

Authors:  Bing-Rui Ni; Stephen G Pallardy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Visualization of root water uptake: quantification of deuterated water transport in roots using neutron radiography and numerical modeling.

Authors:  Mohsen Zarebanadkouki; Eva Kroener; Anders Kaestner; Andrea Carminati
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Root morphology, hydraulic conductivity and plant water relations of high-yielding rice grown under aerobic conditions.

Authors:  Yoichiro Kato; Midori Okami
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Transpiration- and growth-induced water potentials in maize.

Authors:  M E Westgate; J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Resistance to Water Transport in Shoots of Vitis vinifera L. : Relation to Growth at Low Water Potential.

Authors:  H R Schultz; M A Matthews
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Herb and conifer roots show similar high sensitivity to water deficit.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bourbia; Carola Pritzkow; Timothy J Brodribb
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low water potentials in maize.

Authors:  M E Westgate; J S Boyer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Hydraulic Strategy of Cactus Root-Stem Junction for Effective Water Transport.

Authors:  Hyejeong Kim; Kiwoong Kim; Sang Joon Lee
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Constant hydraulic supply enables optical monitoring of transpiration in a grass, a herb, and a conifer.

Authors:  Ibrahim Bourbia; Christopher Lucani; Timothy J Brodribb
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.