Literature DB >> 24248230

Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low water potentials in maize.

M E Westgate1, J S Boyer.   

Abstract

The expansion growth of plant organs is inhibited at low water potentials (Ψ w), but the inhibition has not been compared in different organs of the same plant. Therefore, we determined elongation rates of the roots, stems, leaves, and styles (silks) of maize (Zea mays L.) as soil water was depleted. The Ψ w was measured in the region of cell expansion of each organ. The complicating effects of transpiration were avoided by making measurements at the end of the dark period when the air had been saturated with water vapor for 10 h and transpiration was less than 1% of the rate in the light. Growth was inhibited as the Ψ w in the region of cell expansion decreased in each organ. The Ψ w required to stop growth was-0.50,-0.75, and-1.00 MPa, in this order, in the stem, silks, and leaves. However, the roots grew at these Ψ w and ceased only when Ψ w was lower than-1.4 MPa. The osmotic potential decreased in each region of cell expansion and, in leaves, roots and stems, the decrease was sufficient to maintain turgor fully. In the silks, the decrease was less and turgor fell. In the mature tissue, the Ψ w of the stem, leaves and roots was similar to that of the soil when adequate water was supplied. This indicated that an equilibrium existed between these tissues, the vascular system, and the soil. At the same time, the Ψ w was lower in the expanding regions than in the mature tissues, indicating that there was a Ψ w disequilibrium between the growing tissue and the vascular system. The disequilibrium was interpreted as a Ψ w gradient for supplying water to the enlarging cells. When water was withheld, this gradient disappeared in the leaf because Ψ w decreased more in the xylem than in the soil, indicating that a high flow resistance had developed in the xylem. In the roots, the gradient did not decrease because vascular Ψ w changed about the same amount as the soil Ψ w. Therefore, the gradient in Ψ w favored water uptake by roots but not leaves at low Ψ w. The data show that expansion growth responds to low Ψ w differently in different growing regions of the plant. Because growth depends on the maintenance of turgor for extending the cell walls and the presence of Ψ w gradients for supplying water to the expanding cells, several factors could have been responsible for these differences. The decrease of turgor in the silks and the loss of the Ψ w gradient in the leaves probably contributed to the high sensitivity of these organs. In the leaves, the gradient loss was so complete that it would have prevented growth regardless of other changes. In the roots, the maintenance of turgor and Ψ w gradients probably allowed growth to continue. This difference in turgor and gradient maintenance could contribute to the increase in root/shoot ratios generally observed in water-limited conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 24248230     DOI: 10.1007/BF00395973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  25 in total

1.  Stress relaxation of cell walls and the yield threshold for growth: demonstration and measurement by micro-pressure probe and psychrometer techniques.

Authors:  D J Cosgrove; E Van Volkenburgh; R E Cleland
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Diurnal growth trends, water potential, and osmotic adjustment of maize and sorghum leaves in the field.

Authors:  E Acevedo; E Fereres; T C Hsiao; D W Henderson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Stress-induced osmotic adjustment in growing regions of barley leaves.

Authors:  K Matsuda; A Riazi
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Water transport in plants: Mechanism of apparent changes in resistance during absorption.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Sensitivity of cell division and cell elongation to low water potentials in soybean hypocotyls.

Authors:  R F Meyer; J S Boyer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Isopiestic Technique for Measuring Leaf Water Potentials with a Thermocouple Psychrometer

Authors:  John S Boyer; Edward B Knipling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation.

Authors:  J A Lockhart
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Osmotic adjustment in leaves of sorghum in response to water deficits.

Authors:  M M Jones
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Transpiration- and growth-induced water potentials in maize.

Authors:  M E Westgate; J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Growth-induced Water Potentials in Plant Cells and Tissues.

Authors:  F J Molz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  49 in total

1.  Integration of water stress response: Cell expansion and cuticle deposition in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Eleonora Cominelli; Massimo Galbiati; Chiara Tonelli
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2008-08

Review 2.  Water transport, perception, and response in plants.

Authors:  Johannes Daniel Scharwies; José R Dinneny
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  The root tip and accelerating region suppress elongation of the decelerating region without any effects on cell turgor in primary roots of maize under water stress.

Authors:  Yumi Shimazaki; Taiichiro Ookawa; Tadashi Hirasawa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Control of kernel weight and kernel water relations by post-flowering source-sink ratio in maize.

Authors:  L Borrás; M E Westgate; M E Otegui
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Characterization of a maize tonoplast aquaporin expressed in zones of cell division and elongation.

Authors:  F Chaumont; F Barrieu; E M Herman; M J Chrispeels
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Ovule abortion in Arabidopsis triggered by stress.

Authors:  Kelian Sun; Kimberly Hunt; Bernard A Hauser
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Differential expression of the TFIIIA regulatory pathway in response to salt stress between Medicago truncatula genotypes.

Authors:  Laura de Lorenzo; Francisco Merchan; Sandrine Blanchet; Manuel Megías; Florian Frugier; Martin Crespi; Carolina Sousa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Cell wall proteome in the maize primary root elongation zone. II. Region-specific changes in water soluble and lightly ionically bound proteins under water deficit.

Authors:  Jinming Zhu; Sophie Alvarez; Ellen L Marsh; Mary E Lenoble; In-Jeong Cho; Mayandi Sivaguru; Sixue Chen; Henry T Nguyen; Yajun Wu; Daniel P Schachtman; Robert E Sharp
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Alteration of cell-wall porosity is involved in osmotic stress-induced enhancement of aluminium resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Authors:  Zhong-Bao Yang; Dejene Eticha; Idupulapati Madhusudana Rao; Walter Johannes Horst
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Changes in growth and cell wall extensibility of maize silks following pollination.

Authors:  Nuwan U Sella Kapu; Daniel J Cosgrove
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.