Literature DB >> 16658706

Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: II. At Low Soil Water Potential.

N C Turner1.   

Abstract

Diurnal changes in the vertical profiles of irradiance incident upon the adaxial leaf surface (I), leaf resistance (r(1)), leaf water potential (psi), osmotic potential (pi), and turgor potential (P) were followed concurrently in crops of maize (Zea mays L. cv. Pa602A), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench cv. RS 610), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Havanna Seed 211) on several days in 1968 to 1970 when soil water potentials were low. The r(1), measured with a ventilated diffusion porometer, of the leaves in the upper canopy decreased temporarily after sunrise [ approximately 0530 hours Eastern Standard Time] as I increased, but then r(1) increased again between 0700 and 0830 hr Eastern Standard Time as the psi, measured with a pressure chamber, decreased rapidly from the values of -7, -4 and -6 bars at sunrise to minimal values of -18, -22 and -15 bars near midday in the maize, sorghum, and tobacco, respectively. The pi, measured with a vapor pressure osmometer, also decreased after sunrise, but not to the same degree as the decrease in psi, so that a P of zero was reached in some leaves between 0730 and 0800 hours. The lower (more negative) pi of leaves in the upper canopy than those in the lower canopy gave the upper leaves a higher P at a given psi than the lower leaves in all three species; leaves at intermediate heights had an intermediate P. This difference between leaves at the three heights in the canopy was maintained at all values of psi. The r(1) remained unchanged over a wide range of P and then increased markedly at a P of 2 bars in maize, -1 bar in sorghum, and near zero P in tobacco: r(1) also remained constant until psi decreased to -17, -20, and -13 bars in leaves at intermediate heights in maize, sorghum, and tobacco, respectively. In all three species r(1) of leaves in the upper canopy increased at more negative values of psi than those at the base of the canopy, and in tobacco, leaves in the upper canopy wilted at more negative values of psi than those in the lower canopy.

Entities:  

Year:  1974        PMID: 16658706      PMCID: PMC543223          DOI: 10.1104/pp.53.3.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  8 in total

1.  Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption, and internal water status of cotton.

Authors:  W R Jordan; J T Ritchie
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Analysis of operation and calibration of a ventilated diffusion porometer.

Authors:  N C Turner; J Y Parlange
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans. I. Influence of leaf-water potential.

Authors:  E T Kanemasu; C B Tanner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE AND OSMOTIC POTENTIAL IN LEAVES OF MANGROVES AND SOME OTHER PLANTS.

Authors:  P F Scholander; H T Hammel; E A Hemmingsen; E D Bradstreet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Inhibition of oxygen evolution in chloroplasts isolated from leaves with low water potentials.

Authors:  J S Boyer; B L Bowen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soybean.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: I. At High Soil Water Potential.

Authors:  N C Turner; J E Begg
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery.

Authors:  M F Sanchez-Diaz; P J Kramer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 8.340

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Leaf Age as a Determinant in Stomatal Control of Water Loss from Cotton during Water Stress.

Authors:  W R Jordan; K W Brown; J C Thomas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Influence of a Ceratocystis ulmi Toxin on Water Relations of Elm (Ulmus americana).

Authors:  N K Van Alfen; N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress.

Authors:  J C O'toole; R T Cruz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Is stomatal conductance in a tomato crop controlled by soil or atmosphere?

Authors:  M I Ferreira; N Katerji
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Comparative ecophysiology of the chromosome races in Viola adunca J.E. Smith.

Authors:  Jack Mauer; James M Mayo; Keith Denford
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Seasonal patterns of leaf water relations in four co-occurring forest tree species: Parameters from pressure-volume curves.

Authors:  Stephen W Roberts; Boyd R Strain; Kenneth R Knoerr
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content : II. In the mesophytic herbaceous species Helianthus annuus.

Authors:  Neil C Turner; E -D Schulze; T Gollan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effects of Water Stress on the Ultrastructure of Leaf Cells of Sorghum bicolor.

Authors:  K L Giles; D Cohen; M F Beardsell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Relationships between Leaf Water Status, Abscisic Acid Levels, and Stomatal Resistance in Maize and Sorghum.

Authors:  M F Beardsell; D Cohen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Concurrent comparisons of stomatal behavior, water status, and evaporation of maize in soil at high or low water potential.

Authors:  N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.