Literature DB >> 16657880

Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption, and internal water status of cotton.

W R Jordan1, J T Ritchie.   

Abstract

Diurnal variations in leaf water potential, diffusion resistance, relative water content, stem diameter, leaf temperature, and energy balance components were measured in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. var. Lankart 57) during drought stress under field conditions. A plot of leaf water potential against either relative water content or stem diameter during the 24-hour period yielded a closed hysteresis loop. The relation between cell hydration and evaporation is discussed.Despite low soil water potential in the main root zone, significant plant evaporation rates were maintained. Root absorption rates as a function of soil depth were calculated from water content profiles measured with a neutron probe. The maximal root absorption rate of 3.5 x 10(-3) day(-1) occurred at the 75-centimeter depth, well below the main root zone.Stomatal resistance of individual leaves during the daylight hours remained nearly constant at 2.5 seconds centimeter(-1) even though leaf water potentials approached -30 bars. A growth chamber study indicated stomatal closure occurred at potentials near -16 bars. Possible implications of high soil water stress in relation to stomatal function and growth are discussed. Based on an energy balance method, the actual to potential plant evapotranspiration ratio was 0.43 for the 24-hour period, indicating partial stomatal closure. A surface resistance, r(s), of 4.0 seconds centimeter(-1) was calculated for the incomplete canopy with the use of the energy balance data. Alternatively, a canopy resistance of 1.3 seconds centimeter(-1) was attained from a relationship between leaf area and stomatal resistance of individual leaves. If the soil resistance was assumed to be very large and the canopy resistance was weighted for the fractional ground cover of the crop, the calculated surface resistance was 4.3 seconds centimeter(-1). Under these conditions, the two independent estimates of r(s) were in essential agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  1971        PMID: 16657880      PMCID: PMC396948          DOI: 10.1104/pp.48.6.783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  7 in total

1.  Measuring Transpiration Resistance of Leaves.

Authors:  C H van Bavel; F S Nakayama; W L Ehrler
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Stomatal Diffusion Resistance of Snap Beans. II. Effect of Light.

Authors:  E T Kanemasu; C B Tanner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Leaf diffusion resistance, illuminance, and transpiration.

Authors:  W L Ehrler; C H van Bavel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans. I. Influence of leaf-water potential.

Authors:  E T Kanemasu; C B Tanner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Evaporation and environment.

Authors:  J L Monteith
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1965

6.  Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants.

Authors:  P F Scholander; E D Bradstreet; E A Hemmingsen; H T Hammel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  19 in total

1.  Fifty years of progress in water relations research.

Authors:  P J Kramer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Effect of water stress on cotton leaves : I. An electron microscopic stereological study of the palisade cells.

Authors:  J Berlin; J E Quisenberry; F Bailey; M Woodworth; B L McMichael
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Osmotic Adjustment in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Leaves and Roots in Response to Water Stress.

Authors:  D M Oosterhuis; S D Wullschleger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress.

Authors:  J C O'toole; R T Cruz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Short-term and long-term effects of plant water deficits on stomatal response to humidity in Corylus avellana L.

Authors:  E D Schulze; M Küppers
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Stomatal and nonstomatal regulation of water use in cotton, corn, and sorghum.

Authors:  R C Ackerson; D R Krieg
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Water Potential and Stomatal Resistance of Sunflower and Soybean Subjected to Water Stress during Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  N Sionit; P J Kramer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Concurrent comparisons of stomatal behavior, water status, and evaporation of maize in soil at high or low water potential.

Authors:  N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: II. At Low Soil Water Potential.

Authors:  N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  A water potential threshold for the increase of abscisic Acid in leaves.

Authors:  T J Zabadal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.