Literature DB >> 16658292

Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: I. At High Soil Water Potential.

N C Turner1, J E Begg.   

Abstract

Diurnal changes in the vertical profiles of irradiance incident upon the adaxial leaf surface (I), stomatal resistance (r(s)), leaf water potential (psi), osmotic potential (pi), and turgor potential (P) were followed concurrently in crops of maize (Zea mays L. var. Pa 602A), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench var. RS610), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. var. Havanna Seed 211) on several days in 1968 to 1970 when soil water potentials were high. In all three crops the r(s), measured with a ventilated diffusion porometer, the psi, measured with the pressure chamber, the pi, measured with a vapor pressure osmometer, and the calculated P, decreased from sunrise to reach minimum values near midday and then increased again in the afternoon. The diurnal range of all the variables was greater for leaves in the upper canopy than for those in the lower canopy. P was observed to decrease with decreasing psi, but never became zero. Sorghum had a higher P at a psi of, say -10 bars, than did maize, and maize had a higher P than tobacco at the same psi. Moreover, at the same psi the upper leaves in all canopies had a higher P than the lower leaves. When compared at high irradiances, r(s) did not increase as psi declined to -13, -15, and -10 bars or as P declined to 0.3, 3.5, and 1.2 bars in maize, sorghum, and tobacco, respectively. The relation between r(s) and I in the upper, nonsenescent leaves of all three crops fits a hyperbolic curve, but the response varied with species and leaf senescence. The adaxial and abaxial epidermises had the same response of r(s) to I in maize and sorghum, whereas in tobacco the adaxial epidermis had a higher r(s) than the abaxial epidermis at all values of I. At equal values of I, tobacco had the lowest leaf resistance (r(l)) and maize had the highest r(l). Senescent maize leaves had nonfunctional stomata, whereas the lowermost sorghum leaves had higher stomatal resistances on average than the other leaves.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 16658292      PMCID: PMC367352          DOI: 10.1104/pp.51.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of operation and calibration of a ventilated diffusion porometer.

Authors:  N C Turner; J Y Parlange
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Direct determination of potassium ion accumulation in guard cells in relation to stomatal opening in light.

Authors:  B L Sawhney; I Zelitch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Matric potential of several plant tissues and biocolloids.

Authors:  H H Wiebe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE AND OSMOTIC POTENTIAL IN LEAVES OF MANGROVES AND SOME OTHER PLANTS.

Authors:  P F Scholander; H T Hammel; E A Hemmingsen; E D Bradstreet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Stomatal opening: role of potassium uptake by guard cells.

Authors:  R A Fischer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ozone uptake by bean leaves.

Authors:  S Rich; P E Waggoner; H Tomlinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Matric potentials of leaves.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soybean.

Authors:  J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Water potential gradients in field tobacco.

Authors:  J E Begg; N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery.

Authors:  M F Sanchez-Diaz; P J Kramer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  11 in total

1.  Leaf Age as a Determinant in Stomatal Control of Water Loss from Cotton during Water Stress.

Authors:  W R Jordan; K W Brown; J C Thomas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Influence of a Ceratocystis ulmi Toxin on Water Relations of Elm (Ulmus americana).

Authors:  N K Van Alfen; N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Aerial dispersal and drying of Peronospora tabacina conidia in tobacco shade tents.

Authors:  D E Aylor; G S Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Stomatal Response and Leaf Injury of Pisum sativum L. with SO(2) and O(3) Exposures : II. INFLUENCE OF MOISTURE STRESS AND TIME OF EXPOSURE.

Authors:  D M Olszyk; T W Tibbitts
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress.

Authors:  J C O'toole; R T Cruz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Water balance in developing leaves of four tropical savanna woody species.

Authors:  Frederick Meinzer; Virginia Seymour; Guillermo Goldstein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Analysis of Guard Cell Viability and Action in Senescing Leaves of Nicotiana glauca (Graham), Tree Tobacco.

Authors:  R Ozuna; R Yera; K Ortega; G Tallman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Changes in Alfalfa Stem Conductance Induced by Corynebacterium insidiosum Toxin.

Authors:  N K Van Alfen; N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Concurrent comparisons of stomatal behavior, water status, and evaporation of maize in soil at high or low water potential.

Authors:  N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: II. At Low Soil Water Potential.

Authors:  N C Turner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.