Literature DB >> 16652069

Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs.

Charlotte A Gaydos1, Karen Dwyer, Mathilda Barnes, Patricia A Rizzo-Price, Billie Jo Wood, Toni Flemming, M Terry Hogan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) using self-collected vaginal swabs (VS) is acceptable and accurate. The objectives were to implement an educational Internet-based program for women to facilitate home screening, to determine whether women would request and use self-collected VS kits, to determine associated risk factors for infection, and to determine satisfaction with the process.
METHODS: The website, www.iwantthekit.org, was designed to encourage women > or =14 years to obtain home-sampling kits. Kits could be obtained in the community, requested by Internet/e-mail, or telephone. Users mailed the self-collected VS to the laboratory. Swabs were tested by 3 NAAT assays. Respondents called for results.
RESULTS: Forty-one of 400 (10.3%) women were chlamydia positive; 95.1% were treated. Questionnaires indicated 89.5% preferred self-collection, 93.5% rated collection easy/very easy, and 86.3% would use the Internet program again. Black race and age <25 years were associated independently with being chlamydia positive, while use of birth control and non-consensual sex were protective. Thirty-six of 41 (87.8%) positive samples were positive by all 3 NAATs, 5/41 (12.2%) were positive by only 2 NAATs, and none were positive by only 1 NAAT. The Internet/e-mail request method was better than the community pick-up approach because 97.2% of kit requests were e-mailed and 87.5% of kits returned for testing were e-mail requested.
CONCLUSIONS: Women will use the Internet to request and use home-sampling kits for chlamydia. NAAT testing performed well on dry-transported VS. High prevalence was detected and questionnaires indicated high-risk sexual behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16652069     DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000200497.14326.fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  66 in total

1.  Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men.

Authors:  Shua J Chai; Bulbulgul Aumakhan; Mathilda Barnes; Mary Jett-Goheen; Nicole Quinn; Patricia Agreda; Pamela Whittle; Terry Hogan; Wiley D Jenkins; Cornelis A Rietmeijer; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.830

2. 

Authors:  Walter H Curioso; Magaly M Blas; Ann E Kurth; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica       Date:  2007-07-27

3.  Testing for sexually transmitted infections: a brave new world?

Authors:  R W Peeling
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Home compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna S Graseck; Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Current trends in Internet- and cell phone-based HIV prevention and intervention programs.

Authors:  Michele L Ybarra; Sheana S Bull
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 6.  Implementation Strategies to Increase PrEP Uptake in the South.

Authors:  Patrick S Sullivan; Leandro Mena; Latesha Elopre; Aaron J Siegler
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  Assessing association between IWantTheKit risk quiz tool and sexually transmitted infection positivity in male users for sexually transmitted infection screening.

Authors:  Anuj V Patel; Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.359

Review 8.  A review of current practices to increase Chlamydia screening in the community--a consumer-centred social marketing perspective.

Authors:  Lyn Phillipson; Ross Gordon; Joanne Telenta; Chris Magee; Marty Janssen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Use of a risk quiz to predict infection for sexually transmitted infections: a retrospective analysis of acceptability and positivity.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.