Literature DB >> 16651570

Treatment of glenohumeral arthritis with a hemiarthroplasty: a minimum five-year follow-up outcome study.

Michael A Wirth1, R Stacy Tapscott, Carleton Southworth, Charles A Rockwood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral hemiarthroplasty is well established as a method to treat glenohumeral arthritis. This study was designed to report longer-term results and to provide a decision model to assist surgeons in achieving successful outcomes. Our selection strategy for hemiarthroplasty included shoulders with (1) a concentric glenoid with eburnated bone, (2) a nonconcentric glenoid that could be converted to a smooth concentric surface, and (3) a humeral head centered within the glenoid after soft-tissue balancing.
METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients (sixty-four shoulders) who had osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, without advanced disease in the glenoid, were treated with hemiarthroplasty. In each instance, a modular prosthesis was implanted. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively and at one-year intervals postoperatively for at least five years with use of patient self-assessment instruments, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test, and a visual analog pain scale. A detailed radiographic analysis was performed to determine the presence of glenohumeral subluxation, periprosthetic radiolucency, and glenoid bone loss.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients (fifty shoulders) were followed for a minimum of five years (mean, 7.5 years). Of the remaining fourteen patients (fourteen shoulders), ten were lost to follow-up, three had died, and one was excluded. For the Simple Shoulder Test, and for every visual analog scale measure, the results at the final follow-up evaluation were significantly better than the preoperative results (p < 0.0001 for each). The mean Simple Shoulder Test score at the time of the final follow-up was 9.4 positive responses compared with 9.7 positive responses at the two-year evaluation (p = 0.32), and the mean visual analog scale score for pain was 18.6 points compared with 14.9 points at two years (p = 0.45). Radiographic analysis showed the majority of stems had either no lucency or lucencies only near the tip of the stem. Glenoid bone loss and subluxation improved postoperatively, and the results were maintained at the final follow-up evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty provides sustained good-to-excellent pain relief and functional improvement at five to ten years postoperatively in carefully selected patients with osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16651570     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.03030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  24 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological results 7 years after Copeland shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: an independent multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  F U Verstraelen; L A Horta; M G M Schotanus; N P Kort; S K Samijo; E J P Jansen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  [Survival rate and complications of stemmed shoulder prostheses in primary osteoarthritis].

Authors:  U Irlenbusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Salma Chaudhury; Stephen E Gwilym; Jane Moser; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Shoulder arthroplasty for locked anterior shoulder dislocation: a role for the reversed design.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Bradley S Schoch; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  What Factors are Associated With Clinically Important Improvement After Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty for Cuff Tear Arthropathy?

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Patrick Sander; Kamal Bohsali; Ryan Tibbetts; Charles A Rockwood; Michael A Wirth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Brian P Chalmers; Cameron K Ledford; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Mark E Morrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in diabetic patients as assessed by peri-operative A1C.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Eric R Wagner; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years of age].

Authors:  P Raiss; G Pape; S Becker; M Rickert; M Loew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Conversion of shoulder arthroplasty to reverse implants: clinical and radiological results using a modular system.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Marco Delcogliano; Francesca de Caro; Giovanni Ziveri; Mario Borroni; Stefano Gumina; Franco Postacchini; Carlo Felice De Biase
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Progressive glenoid bone loss caused by erosion in humeral head resurfacing.

Authors:  B S Werner; J Stehle; A Abdelkawi; P Plumhoff; R Hudek; F Gohlke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.