Literature DB >> 16648172

Ion-mediated nucleic acid helix-helix interactions.

Zhi-Jie Tan1, Shi-Jie Chen.   

Abstract

Salt ions are essential for the folding of nucleic acids. We use the tightly bound ion (TBI) model, which can account for the correlations and fluctuations for the ions bound to the nucleic acids, to investigate the electrostatic free-energy landscape for two parallel nucleic acid helices in the solution of added salt. The theory is based on realistic atomic structures of the helices. In monovalent salt, the helices are predicted to repel each other. For divalent salt, while the mean-field Poisson-Boltzmann theory predicts only the repulsion, the TBI theory predicts an effective attraction between the helices. The helices are predicted to be stabilized at an interhelix distance approximately 26-36 A, and the strength of the attractive force can reach -0.37 k(B)T/bp for helix length in the range of 9-12 bp. Both the stable helix-helix distance and the strength of the attraction are strongly dependent on the salt concentration and ion size. With the increase of the salt concentration, the helix-helix attraction becomes stronger and the most stable helix-helix separation distance becomes smaller. For divalent ions, at very high ion concentration, further addition of ions leads to the weakening of the attraction. Smaller ion size causes stronger helix-helix attraction and stabilizes the helices at a shorter distance. In addition, the TBI model shows that a decrease in the solvent dielectric constant would enhance the ion-mediated attraction. The theoretical findings from the TBI theory agree with the experimental measurements on the osmotic pressure of DNA array as well as the results from the computer simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648172      PMCID: PMC1483110          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.084285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  87 in total

1.  Is counterion delocalization responsible for collapse in RNA folding?

Authors:  V L Murthy; G D Rose
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Strong attraction between charged spheres due to metastable ionized states

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Multiscale study of counterion-induced attraction and bundle formation of F-actin using an Ising-like mean-field model.

Authors:  Xueping Yu; A E Carlsson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  RNA and protein folding: common themes and variations.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; Changbong Hyeon
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Interaction between like-charged colloidal spheres in electrolyte solutions.

Authors:  J Wu; D Bratko; J M Prausnitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Novel methods of sampling phase space in the simulation of biological systems.

Authors:  B J Berne; J E Straub
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  DNA condensation by polyamines: a laser light scattering study of structural effects.

Authors:  V Vijayanathan; T Thomas; A Shirahata; T J Thomas
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Interactions of the KWK6 cationic peptide with short nucleic acid oligomers: demonstration of large Coulombic end effects on binding at 0.1-0.2 M salt.

Authors:  Jeff D Ballin; Irina A Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Metal ion-induced lateral aggregation of filamentous viruses fd and M13.

Authors:  Jay X Tang; Paul A Janmey; Alexander Lyubartsev; Lars Nordenskiöld
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  43 in total

1.  Predicting ion binding properties for RNA tertiary structures.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Divalent counterion-induced condensation of triple-strand DNA.

Authors:  Xiangyun Qiu; V Adrian Parsegian; Donald C Rau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  RNA helix stability in mixed Na+/Mg2+ solution.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Charge density of divalent metal cations determines RNA stability.

Authors:  Eda Koculi; Changbong Hyeon; D Thirumalai; Sarah A Woodson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Quantitative analysis of monovalent counterion binding to random-sequence, double-stranded DNA using the replacement ion method.

Authors:  Earle Stellwagen; Qian Dong; Nancy C Stellwagen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Attractive forces between cation condensed DNA double helices.

Authors:  Brian A Todd; V Adrian Parsegian; Akira Shirahata; T J Thomas; Donald C Rau
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Electrostatic free energy landscapes for DNA helix bending.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Importance of diffuse metal ion binding to RNA.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Met Ions Life Sci       Date:  2011

9.  Stochastic study of the effect of ionic strength on noncovalent interactions in protein pores.

Authors:  Qitao Zhao; Dilani A Jayawardhana; Xiyun Guan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Salt-dependent folding energy landscape of RNA three-way junction.

Authors:  Gengsheng Chen; Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.