Literature DB >> 15794634

RNA and protein folding: common themes and variations.

D Thirumalai1, Changbong Hyeon.   

Abstract

Visualizing the navigation of an ensemble of unfolded molecules through the bumpy energy landscape in search of the native state gives a pictorial view of biomolecular folding. This picture, when combined with concepts in polymer theory, provides a unified theory of RNA and protein folding. Just as for proteins, the major folding free energy barrier for RNA scales sublinearly with the number of nucleotides, which allows us to extract the elusive prefactor for RNA folding. Several folding scenarios can be anticipated by considering variations in the energy landscape that depend on sequence, native topology, and external conditions. RNA and protein folding mechanism can be described by the kinetic partitioning mechanism (KPM) according to which a fraction (Phi) of molecules reaches the native state directly, whereas the remaining fraction gets kinetically trapped in metastable conformations. For two-state folders Phi approximately 1. Molecular chaperones are recruited to assist protein folding whenever Phi is small. We show that the iterative annealing mechanism, introduced to describe chaperonin-mediated folding, can be generalized to understand protein-assisted RNA folding. The major differences between the folding of proteins and RNA arise in the early stages of folding. For RNA, folding can only begin after the polyelectrolyte problem is solved, whereas protein collapse requires burial of hydrophobic residues. Cross-fertilization of ideas between the two fields should lead to an understanding of how RNA and proteins solve their folding problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15794634     DOI: 10.1021/bi047314+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  118 in total

1.  Chain length determines the folding rates of RNA.

Authors:  Changbong Hyeon; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Capturing the essence of folding and functions of biomolecules using coarse-grained models.

Authors:  Changbong Hyeon; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  A comparison of genotype-phenotype maps for RNA and proteins.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Connecting energy landscapes with experimental rates for aminoacyl-tRNA accommodation in the ribosome.

Authors:  Paul C Whitford; José N Onuchic; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Exploring the paths of (virus) assembly.

Authors:  Paul Moisant; Henry Neeman; Adam Zlotnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Predicting ion binding properties for RNA tertiary structures.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Tan; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Taming free energy landscapes with RNA chaperones.

Authors:  Sarah A Woodson
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Entropic origin of Mg2+-facilitated RNA folding.

Authors:  Julie L Fiore; Erik D Holmstrom; David J Nesbitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Denaturant-dependent folding of GFP.

Authors:  Govardhan Reddy; Zhenxing Liu; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Multiple stepwise refolding of immunoglobulin domain I27 upon force quench depends on initial conditions.

Authors:  Mai Suan Li; Chin-Kun Hu; Dmitri K Klimov; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.