Literature DB >> 16643386

Prometheus versus molecular adsorbents recirculating system: comparison of efficiency in two different liver detoxification devices.

Pieter Evenepoel1, Wim Laleman, Alexander Wilmer, Kathleen Claes, Dirk Kuypers, Bert Bammens, Frederik Nevens, Yves Vanrenterghem.   

Abstract

Albumin dialysis by the molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS) and by fractionated plasma separation, adsorption, and dialysis (Prometheus[PROM]) represent novel nonbiological liver support systems specifically designed to remove albumin-bound substances. Preliminary evidence suggests a favorable impact of MARS on the course and outcome of liver failure. This study aimed at comparing the detoxification capacity of both devices. For this purpose, we performed a retrospective analysis on data prospectively collected in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with either the MARS (n = 9) or the PROM (n = 9) device on 2-5 consecutive days. Each treatment was performed for at least 5 h at identical blood and dialysate flows. Blood clearances were calculated during the first treatment session for urea nitrogen, creatinine, total bilirubin, and bile acids from paired arterial and venous line samples after 1, 4, and 6 h of treatment. Reduction ratios for all single-treatment sessions, and the overall treatment phase, were calculated from pretreatment and post-treatment values. For all markers but bile acids, the single-treatment as well as the overall treatment phase reduction ratios obtained with PROM were significantly higher compared with those obtained with MARS. PROM led at all time points to higher clearances for all evaluated solutes. Blood clearances of protein-bound substances declined over time with MARS, but not with PROM. In conclusion, a significant decline in the serum level of water-soluble and protein-bound toxins was achieved with both devices. PROM produces higher blood clearances for most toxins, which results in higher delivered treatment doses compared with a matching treatment with MARS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16643386     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00215.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of two different modes of molecular adsorbent recycling systems for liver dialysis.

Authors:  Euan Soo; Anja Sanders; Karlheinz Heckert; Tobias Vinke; Franz Schaefer; Claus Peter Schmitt
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Artificial and bioartificial liver support.

Authors:  Gesine Pless
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Current state of knowledge of hepatic encephalopathy (part IV): Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy by liver support systems.

Authors:  Tarek Hassanein
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.584

4.  Liver dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Rakhi Maiwall; Jaswinder Singh Maras; Suman Lata Nayak; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 5.  Artificial liver support in patients with liver failure: a modified DELPHI consensus of international experts.

Authors:  Faouzi Saliba; Rafael Bañares; Fin Stolze Larsen; Alexander Wilmer; Albert Parés; Steffen Mitzner; Jan Stange; Valentin Fuhrmann; Stefan Gilg; Tarek Hassanein; Didier Samuel; Josep Torner; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 41.787

6.  Thermodynamic considerations in solid adsorption of bound solutes for patient support in liver failure.

Authors:  John F Patzer
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.094

7.  A case of living donor liver transplant recipient treated with novel blood purification "plasma diafiltration".

Authors:  Hironori Hayashi; Hiroyuki Takamura; Takumi Taniguchi; Shin-ichi Nakanuma; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Ichiro Onishi; Takashi Tani; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

8.  Evaluation of a novel hybrid bioartificial liver based on a multi-layer flat-plate bioreactor.

Authors:  Xiao-Lei Shi; Yue Zhang; Xue-Hui Chu; Bing Han; Jin-Yang Gu; Jiang-Qiang Xiao; Jia-Jun Tan; Zhong-Ze Gu; Hao-Zhen Ren; Xian-Wen Yuan; Yi-Tao Ding
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Cell and tissue engineering for liver disease.

Authors:  Sangeeta N Bhatia; Gregory H Underhill; Kenneth S Zaret; Ira J Fox
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Effect of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system and Prometheus devices on systemic haemodynamics and vasoactive agents in patients with acute-on-chronic alcoholic liver failure.

Authors:  Wim Laleman; Alexander Wilmer; Pieter Evenepoel; Ingrid Vander Elst; Marcel Zeegers; Zahur Zaman; Chris Verslype; Johan Fevery; Frederik Nevens
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.