Literature DB >> 22851870

Evaluation of a novel hybrid bioartificial liver based on a multi-layer flat-plate bioreactor.

Xiao-Lei Shi1, Yue Zhang, Xue-Hui Chu, Bing Han, Jin-Yang Gu, Jiang-Qiang Xiao, Jia-Jun Tan, Zhong-Ze Gu, Hao-Zhen Ren, Xian-Wen Yuan, Yi-Tao Ding.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a hybrid bioartificial liver (HBAL) system in the treatment of acute liver failure.
METHODS: Canine models with acute liver failure were introduced with intravenous administration of D-galactosamine. The animals were divided into: the HBAL treatment group (n = 8), in which the canines received a 3-h treatment of HBAL; the bioartificial liver (BAL) treatment group (n = 8), in which the canines received a 3-h treatment of BAL; the non-bioartificial liver (NBAL) treatment group (n = 8), in which the canines received a 3-h treatment of NBAL; the control group (n = 8), in which the canines received no additional treatment. Biochemical parameters and survival time were determined. Levels of xenoantibodies, RNA of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) and reverse transcriptase (RT) activity in the plasma were detected.
RESULTS: Biochemical parameters were significantly decreased in all treatment groups. The TBIL level in the HBAL group was lower than that in other groups (2.19 ± 0.55 μmol/L vs 24.2 ± 6.45 μmol/L, 12.47 ± 3.62 μmol/L, 3.77 ± 1.83 μmol/L, P < 0.05). The prothrombin time (PT) in the BAL and HBAL groups was significantly shorter than the NBAL and control groups (18.47 ± 4.41 s, 15.5 ± 1.56 s vs 28.67 ± 5.71 s, 21.71 ± 3.4 s, P < 0.05), and the PT in the HBAL group was shortest of all the groups. The albumin in the BAL and HBAL groups significantly increased and a significantly higher level was observed in the HBAL group compared with the BAL group (27.7 ± 1.7 g/L vs 25.24 ± 1.93 g/L). In the HBAL group, the ammonia levels significantly decreased from 54.37 ± 6.86 to 37.75 ± 6.09 after treatment (P < 0.05); there were significant difference in ammonia levels between other the groups (P < 0.05). The levels of antibodies were similar before and after treatment. The PERV RNA and the RT activity in the canine plasma were all negative.
CONCLUSION: The HBAL showed great efficiency and safety in the treatment of acute liver failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute liver failure; Co-culture; Flat plate bioreactor; Hybrid bioartificial liver; Nanofiber scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22851870      PMCID: PMC3406430          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i28.3752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  36 in total

1.  Protective effects of ACLF sera on metabolic functions and proliferation of hepatocytes co-cultured with bone marrow MSCs in vitro.

Authors:  Xiao-Lei Shi; Jin-Yang Gu; Yue Zhang; Bing Han; Jiang-Qiang Xiao; Xian-Wen Yuan; Ning Zhang; Yi-Tao Ding
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Molecular adsorbent recirculating system for acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed S Khuroo; Mehnaaz S Khuroo; Karim L C Farahat
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  Themes of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl; John J Fung
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Engineering micropatterned surfaces for the coculture of hepatocytes and Kupffer cells.

Authors:  Yekaterina S Zinchenko; Robin N Coger
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  The effect of three-dimensional co-culture of hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells on key hepatocyte functions in vitro.

Authors:  Robert J Thomas; Rena Bhandari; David A Barrett; Andrew J Bennett; Jeffrey R Fry; Desmond Powe; Brian J Thomson; Kevin M Shakesheff
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.481

6.  Chitosan nanofiber scaffold enhances hepatocyte adhesion and function.

Authors:  Xue-Hui Chu; Xiao-Lei Shi; Zhang-Qi Feng; Zhong-Ze Gu; Yi-Tao Ding
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 7.  A bioartificial liver--state of the art.

Authors:  Alastair J Strain; James M Neuberger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Evaluation of a new immortalized human fetal liver cell line (cBAL111) for application in bioartificial liver.

Authors:  Paul P C Poyck; Albert C W A van Wijk; Tessa V van der Hoeven; Dirk R de Waart; Robert A F M Chamuleau; Thomas M van Gulik; Ronald P J Oude Elferink; Ruurdtje Hoekstra
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Functional and morphological comparison of three primary liver cell types cultured in the AMC bioartificial liver.

Authors:  Paul P C Poyck; Ruurdtje Hoekstra; Albert C W A van Wijk; Chiara Attanasio; Fulvio Calise; Robert A F M Chamuleau; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Three-dimensional growth of human hepatoma C3A cells within alginate beads for fluidized bioartificial liver.

Authors:  A Kinasiewicz; A Gautier; D Lewiska; A Smietanka; C Legallais; A Weryński
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.595

View more
  2 in total

1.  Alleviating liver failure conditions using an integrated hybrid cryogel based cellular bioreactor as a bioartificial liver support.

Authors:  Apeksha Damania; Mohsin Hassan; Nana Shirakigawa; Hiroshi Mizumoto; Anupam Kumar; Shiv K Sarin; Hiroyuki Ijima; Masamichi Kamihira; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Improved survival of porcine acute liver failure by a bioartificial liver device implanted with induced human functional hepatocytes.

Authors:  Xiao-Lei Shi; Yimeng Gao; Yupeng Yan; Hucheng Ma; Lulu Sun; Pengyu Huang; Xuan Ni; Ludi Zhang; Xin Zhao; Haozhen Ren; Dan Hu; Yan Zhou; Feng Tian; Yuan Ji; Xin Cheng; Guoyu Pan; Yi-Tao Ding; Lijian Hui
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 25.617

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.