Literature DB >> 16641772

Multilevel cervical fusion and its effect on disc degeneration and osteophyte formation.

Carlos G Lopez-Espina1, Farid Amirouche, Vinod Havalad.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The effect of single and double cervical fusion on adjacent segments was investigated using a finite element model of the cervical spine. A healthy spine and a cervical spine with a single and double fusion at different levels were analyzed and evaluated. Disc degeneration and osteophyte formation at the endplates and joints can then be addressed.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biomechanical effects of cervical fusion on the cervical spine from C3-C7. The goal was to asses the increase of intervertebral disc and bone stress induced by cervical fusion, the effects of single versus double level fusion, and whether the level in which the fusion is performed, might affect the biomechanics of the spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have reported that 25% of fusion patients report further degenerative problems within 10 years of fusion. METHODS.: Four finite element models of single fusion at different levels were generated, as well as three additional models for the case of double fusion. The maximum von Mises stresses for anulus, nucleus, and endplates and the motion of the nonfused segments were obtained during lateral bending, flexion, axial torsion, and extension. Each case was compared with the normal cervical spine.
RESULTS: Results showed stress increases of up to 96% in the anulus, nucleus, and endplates after fusion. Facet constraining prevents increases in stress during extension. The stresses at all levels tend to be larger for double than for single fusion.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study quantify the significant increase in the level of stresses below and above the fused segments in the cervical spine. A sustained level of this stress can lead to further discs degeneration and osteophytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16641772     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000215205.66437.c3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Modified transcorporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy assisted by O-arm-based navigation: a technical case report.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Sang Soo Eun; Nicolas Prada; Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Stavroula Pagkrati; Danilo Leonetti; Maria Teresa Miscione; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Cervical adjacent segment pathology following fusion: Is it due to fusion?

Authors:  Philip Rosenthal; Kee D Kim
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-07-18

Review 4.  Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Zhiwei Jia; Zhongjun Mo; Fan Ding; Qing He; Yubo Fan; Dike Ruan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis surgically treated by Cloward procedure: a 10-year-minimum follow-up study.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Danilo Leonetti; Matteo Nanni; Alberto Di Martino; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-06-09

6.  Initial clinical experience with a next-generation artificial disc for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Alejandro Reyes-Sanchez; Victor Miramontes; Luis M Rosales Olivarez; Armando Alpizar Aquirre; Alfredo Ortega Quiroz; Baron Zarate-Kalfopulos
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-03-01

7.  Biomechanics of Artificial Disc Replacements Adjacent to a 2-Level Fusion in 4-Level Hybrid Constructs: An In Vitro Investigation.

Authors:  Zhenhua Liao; Guy R Fogel; Na Wei; Hongsheng Gu; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-12-23

8.  One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; Todd H Lanman; J Kenneth Burkus; Scott D Hodges; Jeffrey R McConnell; Randall F Dryer; Francine W Schranck; Anne G Copay
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

9.  Long-term follow-up radiologic and clinical evaluation of cylindrical cage for anterior interbody fusion in degenerative cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Suhyeong Kim; Hyoung-Joon Chun; Hyeon-Joong Yi; Koang Hum Bak; Dong Won Kim; Yoon Kyoung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-08-31

Review 10.  Hybrid surgery versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Tian; Xin Fu; Zhi-Jun Li; Xiao-Lei Sun; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.