Literature DB >> 23878777

Cervical adjacent segment pathology following fusion: Is it due to fusion?

Philip Rosenthal1, Kee D Kim.   

Abstract

Adjacent segment pathology affects 25% of patients within ten years of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Laboratory studies demonstrate fused segments increase adjacent level stress including elevated intradiscal pressure and increased range of motion. Radiographic adjacent segment pathology (RASP) has been associated to ACDF in multiple statistically significant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty (ACDA) and ACDF have confirmed ACDF accelerates RASP. The question of greatest clinical interest is whether ACDA, artificial disc surgery, results in fewer adjacent level surgeries than ACDF. Current RCT follow up results reveal only non statistically significant trends favoring ACDA yet the post operative periods are only two to four years. Statistically significant increased RASP in ACDF patients however is already documented. The RCT patients' average ages are in the mid forties with an expected longevity of up to forty more years. Early statistically significant increased RASP in the ACDF patients supports our prediction that given sufficient follow up of ten or more years, fusion will lead to statistically significant higher rate of adjacent level surgery compared to artificial disc surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent; Arthroplasty; Cervical; Degeneration; Diskectomy; Fusion

Year:  2013        PMID: 23878777      PMCID: PMC3717242          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  14 in total

1.  Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; S Craig Humphreys; Tae-Hong Lim; Soon Tack Jeong; Jesse G Kim; Scott D Hodges; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; G D Carlson; M A Palumbo; P K Jones; H H Bohlman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Eric Geusens; Nicolaas Vantomme; Els Quintens; Yannic Waerzeggers; Bart Depreitere; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johan van Loon
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-04

4.  Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials.

Authors:  Cheerag D Upadhyaya; Jau-Ching Wu; Gregory Trost; Regis W Haid; Vincent C Traynelis; Bobby Tay; Domagoj Coric; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-12-23

5.  Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Ung-Kyu Chang; Daniel H Kim; Max C Lee; Rafer Willenberg; Se-Hoon Kim; Jesse Lim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-07

6.  Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  S L Weinhoffer; R D Guyer; M Herbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Anterior cervical fusion: a finite element model study on motion segment stability including the effect of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R N Natarajan; B H Chen; H S An; G B Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy.

Authors:  H Baba; N Furusawa; S Imura; N Kawahara; H Tsuchiya; K Tomita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients.

Authors:  D R Gore; S B Sepic
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  J Beaurain; P Bernard; T Dufour; J M Fuentes; I Hovorka; J Huppert; J P Steib; J M Vital; L Aubourg; T Vila
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on adjacent segments in rabbits.

Authors:  Liang-Zheng Xia; Yan-Ping Zheng; Hong-Guang Xu; Ping Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

Review 2.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shihua Zou; Junyi Gao; Bin Xu; Xiangdong Lu; Yongbin Han; Hui Meng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Minimum 4-year outcomes of cervical total disc arthroplasty versus fusion: a meta-analysis based on prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Hui Xu; Kenneth Paul Mullinix; Hai-Ming Jin; Zhe-Yu Huang; Qing-Bo Lv; Sheng Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Comparison of the more than 5-year clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Min-Min Shao; Chun-Hui Chen; Zhong-Ke Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang; Qi-Shan Huang; Yong-Long Chi; Ai-Min Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.