Literature DB >> 27065661

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Breast Reconstruction Surgery and Therapeutic Mammoplasty: Prospective Evaluation 1 Year Post-Surgery with BREAST-Q Questionnaire.

Laxmi Shekhawat1, Laleh Busheri1, Santosh Dixit1, Chaula Patel1, Upendra Dhar1, Chaitanyanand Koppiker1.   

Abstract

Breast Cancer (BC) treatment leads to mutilation and destruction of breast shape with negative effects on body image and self-esteem.One of the main goals of reconstructive and oncoplastic breast surgery is to satisfy patients and improve their quality of life (QoL).Therefore, it is important to assess the patient experience post-surgery by means of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that focus on the patient's perception of the surgery and surgical care, as well as psychosocial well-being and physical functioning. The objective of the current study was to identify predictors of patient satisfaction such as breast appearance including implant type in a selective sample of women who underwent breast reconstruction surgery using implants. Participants in this prospective study were women, (age 26-75 years) that were newly diagnosed with breast carcinoma. All consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction between January 2013 and October 2014 were asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire 1 year after surgery. 120 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using implant. While 38 patients underwent reconstruction with opposite breast reduction symmertization, 27 patients underwent therapeutic mammoplasty. The response rate for BREAST-Q questionnaire completion was 98 % with 147 out of 150 study participants completed the questionnaire. From the data collected from 147 patients, the responses could be distributed into 4 distinct groups based on the reconstruction outcomes namely "very much satisfied" (93 %) or "definitely and mostly satisfied" (94 %) or "satisfied" with the outcome (88 %) or "definitely agree on having reconstruction rather than the alternative of having no breast "(91 %).The results showed significant improvement in all four areas that were evaluated after surgery namely satisfaction with the appearance of the breasts, psychosocial, sexual and physical well-being. While the reconstruction surgery had an overall positive impact on quality of life it was observed that in patients that did not undergo breast reconstruction psychological issues related to sexuality were observed. Many newly diagnosed BC patients do not opt for these new surgical procedures due to psychological trauma or lack of information. Based on these observations, we propose that Breast Cancer Management protocols should also include additional counselling support for the newly diagnosed BC patients on the option of breast reconstruction along with conventional medical treatment counselling by the Oncosurgeon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast carcinoma; Breast reconstruction; Mastectomy; Post mastectomy reconstruction; Quality of life

Year:  2015        PMID: 27065661      PMCID: PMC4809840          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-015-0432-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  36 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient- reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Zoë Ellen Winters; John R Benson; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Anne Klassen; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy is as safe as mastectomy alone.

Authors:  A L Vinton; L W Traverso; R D Zehring
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-10

5.  Psychosocial issues in breast reconstruction. Intrapsychic, interpersonal, and practical concerns.

Authors:  W S Schain; E Jacobs; D K Wellisch
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 6.  Postmastectomy breast reconstruction: current techniques.

Authors:  A R Shons; G Mosiello
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Nano; Peter Grantley Gill; James Kollias; Melissa Anne Bochner; Nicholas Carter; Helen R Winefield
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast.

Authors:  D K Wellisch; W S Schain; R B Noone; J W Little
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  L A Stevens; M H McGrath; R G Druss; S J Kister; F E Gump; K A Forde
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Constance M Chen; Stefan Cano; Anne Klassen; Colleen McCarthy; E Dale Collins; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  8 in total

1.  Oncological Safety, Surgical Outcome, and Patient Satisfaction of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery With Contralateral Balancing Reduction Mammoplasty.

Authors:  Hannah St Denis-Katz; Bahareh B Ghaedi; Aisling Fitzpatrick; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Advanced Autologous Lower Dermal Sling Technique for Immediate Breast Reconstruction Surgery in Small and Non-ptotic Breasts.

Authors:  Chaitanyanand B Koppiker; Aijaz Ul Noor; Santosh Dixit; Laleh Busheri; Gautam Sharan; Upendra Dhar; Hari Kiran Allampati; Smeeta Nare; Nutan Gangurde
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Examining the Post-operative Well-Being of Women Who Underwent Mammoplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jessica Ranieri; Fabiana Fiasca; Federica Guerra; Enrico Perilli; Antonella Mattei; Dina Di Giacomo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 4.  Systematic Review of Breast-Q: A Tool to Evaluate Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ishith Seth; Nimish Seth; Gabriella Bulloch; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Outcome reporting in therapeutic mammaplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Lee; Richard M Kwasnicki; Hasaan Khan; Yasmin Grant; Abigail Chan; Angela E E Fanshawe; Daniel R Leff
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09

6.  Well-Being, Depression, and Anxiety following Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery versus Modified Radical Mastectomy Followed by Late Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daciana Grujic; Cătălina Giurgi-Oncu; Cristina Oprean; Zorin Crăiniceanu; Ica Secoșan; Ioana Riviș; Ion Papavă; Corina Vernic; Cristina Bredicean
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Impact of Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Stana Pačarić; Želimir Orkić; Marko Babić; Nikolina Farčić; Andrea Milostić-Srb; Robert Lovrić; Ivana Barać; Štefica Mikšić; Jasenka Vujanić; Tajana Turk; Zvjezdana Gvozdanović; Dragica Pavlović; Nika Srb; Ivana Pačarić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 8.  Psychosocial Aspects of Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Heimes; Kathrin Stewen; Annette Hasenburg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.860

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.