Literature DB >> 16641486

Comparison of crystal structures of human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain complexed with various agonists reveals molecular determinants responsible for binding affinity.

Karine Pereira de Jésus-Tran1, Pierre-Luc Côté, Line Cantin, Jonathan Blanchet, Fernand Labrie, Rock Breton.   

Abstract

Androgens exert their effects by binding to the highly specific androgen receptor (AR). In addition to natural potent androgens, AR binds a variety of synthetic agonist or antagonist molecules with different affinities. To identify molecular determinants responsible for this selectivity, we have determined the crystal structure of the human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain (hARLBD) in complex with two natural androgens, testosterone (Testo) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and with an androgenic steroid used in sport doping, tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), at 1.64, 1.90, and 1.75 A resolution, respectively. Comparison of these structures first highlights the flexibility of several residues buried in the ligand-binding pocket that can accommodate a variety of ligand structures. As expected, the ligand structure itself (dimension, presence, and position of unsaturated bonds that influence the geometry of the steroidal nucleus or the electronic properties of the neighboring atoms, etc.) determines the number of interactions it can make with the hARLBD. Indeed, THG--which possesses the highest affinity--establishes more van der Waals contacts with the receptor than the other steroids, whereas the geometry of the atoms forming electrostatic interactions at both extremities of the steroid nucleus seems mainly responsible for the higher affinity measured experimentally for DHT over Testo. Moreover, estimation of the ligand-receptor interaction energy through modeling confirms that even minor modifications in ligand structure have a great impact on the strength of these interactions. Our crystallographic data combined with those obtained by modeling will be helpful in the design of novel molecules with stronger affinity for the AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16641486      PMCID: PMC2242507          DOI: 10.1110/ps.051905906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  48 in total

1.  Structural evidence for ligand specificity in the binding domain of the human androgen receptor. Implications for pathogenic gene mutations.

Authors:  P M Matias; P Donner; R Coelho; M Thomaz; C Peixoto; S Macedo; N Otto; S Joschko; P Scholz; A Wegg; S Bäsler; M Schäfer; U Egner; M A Carrondo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

3.  Swiss-PDB Viewer (Deep View).

Authors:  W Kaplan; T G Littlejohn
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Monte Carlo-minimized energy profile of estradiol in the ligand-binding tunnel of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: atomic mechanisms of steroid recognition.

Authors:  B S Zhorov; S X Lin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-03-01

5.  Crystallographic structures of the ligand-binding domains of the androgen receptor and its T877A mutant complexed with the natural agonist dihydrotestosterone.

Authors:  J S Sack; K F Kish; C Wang; R M Attar; S E Kiefer; Y An; G Y Wu; J E Scheffler; M E Salvati; S R Krystek; R Weinmann; H M Einspahr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chloride channels of glycine and GABA receptors with blockers: Monte Carlo minimization and structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  B S Zhorov; P D Bregestovski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Specific recognition of androgens by their nuclear receptor. A structure-function study.

Authors:  N Poujol; J M Wurtz; B Tahiri; S Lumbroso; J C Nicolas; D Moras; C Sultan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Bilateral testicular tumors in androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  N Sakai; T Yamada; T Asao; M Baba; M Yoshida; T Murayama
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  Structural basis for the glucocorticoid response in a mutant human androgen receptor (AR(ccr)) derived from an androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pedro M Matias; Maria Arménia Carrondo; Ricardo Coelho; Monica Thomaz; Xiao-Yan Zhao; Anja Wegg; Kerstin Crusius; Ursula Egner; Peter Donner
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Eight novel mutations of the androgen receptor gene in patients with androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  B Chávez; J P Méndez; A Ulloa-Aguirre; F Larrea; F Vilchis
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  47 in total

1.  Ultrafast protein structure-based virtual screening with Panther.

Authors:  Sanna P Niinivehmas; Kari Salokas; Sakari Lätti; Hannu Raunio; Olli T Pentikäinen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  X-ray structures of progesterone receptor ligand binding domain in its agonist state reveal differing mechanisms for mixed profiles of 11β-substituted steroids.

Authors:  Scott J Lusher; Hans C A Raaijmakers; Diep Vu-Pham; Bert Kazemier; Rolien Bosch; Ross McGuire; Rita Azevedo; Hans Hamersma; Koen Dechering; Arthur Oubrie; Marcel van Duin; Jacob de Vlieg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Integrating statistical predictions and experimental verifications for enhancing protein-chemical interaction predictions in virtual screening.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Nagamine; Takayuki Shirakawa; Yusuke Minato; Kentaro Torii; Hiroki Kobayashi; Masaya Imoto; Yasubumi Sakakibara
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain with a coactivator-like peptide and selective androgen receptor modulators.

Authors:  Maxime Thauvin; Catherine Robin-Jagerschmidt; François Nique; Patrick Mollat; Damien Fleury; Thierry Prangé
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2008-11-28

5.  Computational Assessment of Pharmacokinetics and Biological Effects of Some Anabolic and Androgen Steroids.

Authors:  Marin Roman; Diana Larisa Roman; Vasile Ostafe; Alecu Ciorsac; Adriana Isvoran
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Studies of metabolite-protein interactions: a review.

Authors:  Ryan Matsuda; Cong Bi; Jeanethe Anguizola; Matthew Sobansky; Elliott Rodriguez; John Vargas Badilla; Xiwei Zheng; Benjamin Hage; David S Hage
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Synthesis and structure-activity relationship studies of novel dihydropyridones as androgen receptor modulators.

Authors:  Antonella Pepe; Michael Pamment; Yeong Sang Kim; Sunmin Lee; Min-Jung Lee; Kristin Beebe; Anton Filikov; Len Neckers; Jane B Trepel; Sanjay V Malhotra
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Constitutive activity of the androgen receptor.

Authors:  Siu Chiu Chan; Scott M Dehm
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2014

9.  MixMD Probeview: Robust Binding Site Prediction from Cosolvent Simulations.

Authors:  Sarah E Graham; Noah Leja; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Kinetic and thermodynamic characterization of dihydrotestosterone-induced conformational perturbations in androgen receptor ligand-binding domain.

Authors:  Ravi Jasuja; Jagadish Ulloor; Christopher M Yengo; Karen Choong; Andrei Y Istomin; Dennis R Livesay; Donald J Jacobs; Ronald S Swerdloff; Jaroslava Miksovská; Randy W Larsen; Shalender Bhasin
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.