OBJECTIVES: To determine the true potential for solid organ donation from deceased heartbeating donors and the reasons for non-donation from potential donors. DESIGN: An audit of all deaths in intensive care units, 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2005. The study was hierarchic, in that information was sought on whether or not brain stem testing was carried out; if so, whether or not organ donation was considered; if so whether or not the next of kin were approached; if so, whether or not consent was given; if so, whether or not organ donation took place. SETTING: 341 intensive care units in 284 hospitals in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 46,801 dead patients, leading to 2740 potential heartbeating solid organ donors and 1244 actual donors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of potential deceased heartbeating donors considered for organ donation, proportion of families who denied consent, and proportion of potential donors who became organ donors. RESULTS: Over the two years of the study, 41% of the families of potential donors denied consent. The refusal rate for families of potential donors from ethnic minorities was twice that for white potential donors, but the age and sex of the potential donor did not affect the refusal rate. In 15% of families of potential donors there was no record of the next of kin being approached for permission for organ donation. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care units are extremely good in considering possible organ donation from suitable patients. The biggest obstacle to improving the organ donation rate is the high proportion of relatives who deny consent.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the true potential for solid organ donation from deceased heartbeating donors and the reasons for non-donation from potential donors. DESIGN: An audit of all deaths in intensive care units, 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2005. The study was hierarchic, in that information was sought on whether or not brain stem testing was carried out; if so, whether or not organ donation was considered; if so whether or not the next of kin were approached; if so, whether or not consent was given; if so, whether or not organ donation took place. SETTING: 341 intensive care units in 284 hospitals in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 46,801 dead patients, leading to 2740 potential heartbeating solid organ donors and 1244 actual donors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of potential deceased heartbeating donors considered for organ donation, proportion of families who denied consent, and proportion of potential donors who became organ donors. RESULTS: Over the two years of the study, 41% of the families of potential donors denied consent. The refusal rate for families of potential donors from ethnic minorities was twice that for white potential donors, but the age and sex of the potential donor did not affect the refusal rate. In 15% of families of potential donors there was no record of the next of kin being approached for permission for organ donation. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care units are extremely good in considering possible organ donation from suitable patients. The biggest obstacle to improving the organ donation rate is the high proportion of relatives who deny consent.
Authors: Jeremy Wight; Michael Jakubovic; Stephen Walters; Ravi Maheswaran; Paul White; Veronica Lennon Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Ellen Sheehy; Suzanne L Conrad; Lori E Brigham; Richard Luskin; Phyllis Weber; Mark Eakin; Lawrence Schkade; Lawrence Hunsicker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James Morgan; Cathy Hopkinson; Cara Hudson; Paul Murphy; Dale Gardiner; Olive McGowan; Cathy Miller Journal: J Intensive Care Soc Date: 2017-11-15
Authors: Kevin Schulte; Christoph Borzikowsky; Axel Rahmel; Felix Kolibay; Nina Polze; Patrick Fränkel; Susanne Mikle; Benedikt Alders; Ulrich Kunzendorf; Thorsten Feldkamp Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Yorick J de Groot; Nichon E Jansen; Jan Bakker; Michael A Kuiper; Stan Aerdts; Andrew I R Maas; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Hendrik A van Leiden; Andries J Hoitsma; Berry H P H Kremer; Erwin J O Kompanje Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 17.440