Literature DB >> 16640814

Cyclophosphamide mobilization does not improve outcome in patients receiving stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

David Dingli1, Grzegorz S Nowakowski, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Q Lacy, Suzanne Hayman, Mark R Litzow, Dennis A Gastineau, Morie A Gertz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with multiple myeloma who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and exhibit a complete response (CR) have a superior overall survival and time to progression (TTP). High-dose cyclophosphamide is often used before ASCT for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells. We hypothesized that cyclophosphamide might further improve CR rates in patients undergoing ASCT. We searched the Mayo Clinic myeloma transplantation database for patients who had stem cell mobilization with hematopoietic growth factor alone or cyclophosphamide and growth factor. The impact of cyclophosphamide on CR rates and TTP was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 201 patients was identified: 127 mobilized with cyclophosphamide and growth factor and 74 with growth factor alone. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in regard to age, sex, b2-microglobulin level, plasma cell labeling index, cytogenetics, conditioning regimen, or disease status at time of transplantation.
RESULTS: Complete response rates were 37.4% and 41.3% (P = 0.6115) for patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide combined with growth factor and growth factor alone, respectively, and TTPs were 19.9 months and 20.9 months (P = 0.59). In a multivariate analysis for TTP, cytogenetics and CR rates were the only independent variables (P = 0.0012 and P < 0.0001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that high-dose cyclophosphamide does not increase overall CR rates or improve TTP for patients with myeloma undergoing ASCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16640814     DOI: 10.3816/CLM.2006.n.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma        ISSN: 1557-9190


  21 in total

Review 1.  How best to use new therapies in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  David Dingli; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Association between mobilization regimen and PFS after auto-SCT for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A L Garfall; A L Dougherty; D T Vogl; B M Weiss; A D Cohen; R Mick; U O'Doherty; E A Stadtmauer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sascha A Tuchman; Wendi A Bacon; Li-Wen Huang; Gwynn Long; David Rizzieri; Mitchell Horwitz; John P Chute; Keith Sullivan; Ashley Morris Engemann; Amanda Yopp; Zhiguo Li; Kelly Corbet; Nelson Chao; Cristina Gasparetto
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  The association of mobilising regimen on immune reconstitution and survival in myeloma patients treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction followed by a melphalan autograft.

Authors:  Matthew J Rees; Peter Mollee; Jun Yen Ng; Alex Murton; Jose Filipe Gonsalves; Ashish Panigrahi; Hayley Beer; Joanna Loh; Philip Nguyen; Sam Hunt; Hayden Jina; Rebecca Wayte; Gaurav Sutrave; Jocelyn Tan; Chathuri Abeyakoon; Ashlyn Chee; Bradley Augustson; Akash Kalro; Cindy Lee; Shivam Agrawal; Leonid Churilov; Chong Chyn Chua; Andrew Boon Ming Lim; Daniela Zantomio; Andrew Grigg
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Comparison of high-dose CY and growth factor with growth factor alone for mobilization of stem cells for transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M A Gertz; S K Kumar; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; S R Hayman; F K Buadi; D Dingli; D A Gastineau; J L Winters; M R Litzow
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Impact of additional cytoreduction following autologous SCT in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sk Kumar; D Dingli; A Dispenzieri; Mq Lacy; S R Hayman; Fk Buadi; Sv Rajkumar; Mr Litzow; Ma Gertz
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide overcomes the suppressive effect of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell collection in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tomer Mark; Jessica Stern; Jessica R Furst; David Jayabalan; Faiza Zafar; April LaRow; Roger N Pearse; John Harpel; Tsiporah Shore; Michael W Schuster; John P Leonard; Paul J Christos; Morton Coleman; Ruben Niesvizky
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Improved progression-free and event-free survival in myeloma patients undergoing PBSCH receiving a cyclophosphamide + G-CSF regimen than G-CSF alone.

Authors:  Akira Tanimura; Risen Hirai; Miki Nakamura; Masataka Takeshita; Shotaro Hagiwara; Akiyoshi Miwa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Single Dose Preemptive Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization for ASCT After Lenalidomide Based Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Impact in Resource Limited Setting.

Authors:  Rajiv Kumar; Rajan Kapoor; Bhushan Asthana; Jasjit Singh; Tarun Verma; Rajesh Chilaka; N K Singh; Ajay Sharma; S Das; Velu Nair
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 10.  How we manage autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; David Dingli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.