Literature DB >> 18997825

Comparison of high-dose CY and growth factor with growth factor alone for mobilization of stem cells for transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

M A Gertz1, S K Kumar, M Q Lacy, A Dispenzieri, S R Hayman, F K Buadi, D Dingli, D A Gastineau, J L Winters, M R Litzow.   

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 716 patients with multiple myeloma who were mobilized using CY and growth factor (n=370) or growth factor alone (n=346) before SCT. Patients receiving CY had higher stem cell yields than the growth factor only group (median number of apheresis sessions needed to achieve stem cell collection goals, two vs four sessions, respectively (P=0.001)). However, patients treated with CY required more time for engraftment of platelets and neutrophils (P<0.001 for both). For patients receiving CY, 75% achieved engraftment (defined as a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/l) by day 39, whereas 75% of patients not receiving CY achieved engraftment by day 18. Similar results were observed for neutrophil engraftment. These differences did not affect the duration of hospitalization, but patients treated with CY had a higher incidence of post transplant nonstaphylococcal bacteremia. For CY-mobilized patients, considerably faster platelet engraftment (5 fewer days) resulted if stem cell reinfusion occurred more than 30 days after the first apheresis session. Our data suggested that CY damaged the microenvironment and slowed engraftment. By lengthening the period between the completion of apheresis and stem cell reinfusion, the microenvironment may recover and result in faster engraftment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997825      PMCID: PMC2914501          DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2008.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  35 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow stromal damage after chemo/radiotherapy: occurrence, consequences and possibilities of treatment.

Authors:  A Banfi; G Bianchi; M Galotto; R Cancedda; R Quarto
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma poorly responsive to initial therapy.

Authors:  S Kumar; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; S V Rajkumar; R Fonseca; S Geyer; C Allmer; T E Witzig; J A Lust; P R Greipp; R A Kyle; M R Litzow; M A Gertz
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Compromised stem cell mobilization following induction therapy with lenalidomide in myeloma.

Authors:  H Paripati; A K Stewart; S Cabou; A Dueck; V J Zepeda; N Pirooz; C Ehlenbeck; C Reeder; J Slack; J F Leis; J Boesiger; A S Torloni; R Fonseca; P L Bergsagel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Randomized trial of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation.

Authors:  U Narayanasami; R Kanteti; J Morelli; A Klekar; A Al-Olama; C Keating; C O'Connor; E Berkman; J K Erban; K A Sprague; K B Miller; D P Schenkein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  CD34+ selection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation following sequential cycles of high-dose therapy and mobilization in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P G Dyson; N Horvath; D Joshua; L Barrow; N G Van Holst; R Brown; J Gibson; L B To
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Purging of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells using CD34 selection does not improve overall or progression-free survival after high-dose chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A K Stewart; R Vescio; G Schiller; O Ballester; S Noga; H Rugo; C Freytes; E Stadtmauer; S Tarantolo; F Sahebi; P Stiff; J Meharchard; R Schlossman; R Brown; H Tully; M Benyunes; C Jacobs; R Berenson; M White; J DiPersio; K C Anderson; J Berenson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Differential damage and recovery of human mesenchymal stem cells after exposure to chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Jing Li; Helen K W Law; Yu Lung Lau; Godfrey Chi Fung Chan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell large volume leukapheresis (LVL) on the Fenwal Amicus blood separator.

Authors:  Edwin A Burgstaler; Alvaro A Pineda; Jeffrey L Winters
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Preceding chemotherapy, tumour load and age influence engraftment in multiple myeloma patients mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone.

Authors:  K R Desikan; G Tricot; N C Munshi; E Anaissie; D Spoon; A Fassas; A Toor; M Zangari; A Badros; C Morris; D H Vesole; D Siegel; S Jagannath; B Barlogie
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Single high doses of cyclophosphamide enable the collection of high numbers of hemopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood.

Authors:  L B To; K M Shepperd; D N Haylock; P G Dyson; P Charles; D L Thorp; B M Dale; G W Dart; M M Roberts; R E Sage
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  29 in total

1.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.

Authors:  Lauren Veltri; Aaron Cumpston; Alexandra Shillingburg; Sijin Wen; Jin Luo; Sonia Leadmon; Kathy Watkins; Michael Craig; Mehdi Hamadani; Abraham S Kanate
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.414

2.  Mobilization policy in multiple myeloma: minimum target or law of redundancy? Two different approaches by the two sides of the Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  A Olivieri; F Saraceni
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.

Authors:  S Afifi; N G Adel; S Devlin; E Duck; J Vanak; H Landau; D J Chung; N Lendvai; A Lesokhin; N Korde; L Reich; O Landgren; S Giralt; H Hassoun
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients: a position statement from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  M Mohty; K Hübel; N Kröger; M Aljurf; J Apperley; G W Basak; A Bazarbachi; K Douglas; I Gabriel; L Garderet; C Geraldes; O Jaksic; M W Kattan; Z Koristek; F Lanza; R M Lemoli; L Mendeleeva; G Mikala; N Mikhailova; A Nagler; H C Schouten; D Selleslag; S Suciu; A Sureda; N Worel; P Wuchter; C Chabannon; R F Duarte
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Immune mobilization of autologous blood progenitor cells: direct influence on the cellular subsets collected.

Authors:  Kenneth R Meehan; Laleh Talebian; Jillian Wu; John M Hill; Zbigniew M Szczepiorkowski; Charles L Sentman; Marc S Ernstoff
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 5.414

6.  Successful mobilization of PBSCs predicts favorable outcomes in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents and autologous transplantation.

Authors:  A Brioli; G Perrone; F Patriarca; A Pezzi; F Nobile; F Ballerini; M R Motta; S Ronconi; P Tacchetti; L Catalano; B A Zannetti; S Rizzi; S Volpe; E Zamagni; A M Liberati; K Mancuso; M Boccadoro; F E Davies; G J Morgan; A Palumbo; M Cavo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.

Authors:  A Antar; Z K Otrock; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; H A Ghaddara; N Kreidieh; R Mahfouz; A Bazarbachi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Efficacy of stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after a CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Hyungchul Park; Jae-Sook Ahn; Deok-Hwan Yang; Mi-Young Kim; Yeo-Kyeoung Kim; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Je-Jung Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Safety and efficacy of upfront plerixafor + G-CSF versus placebo + G-CSF for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients ≥60 and <60 years of age with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Ivana N Micallef; Patrick J Stiff; Edward A Stadtmauer; Brian J Bolwell; Auayporn P Nademanee; Richard T Maziarz; Angela M Partisano; Sachin Marulkar; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.047

10.  Filgrastim-alone versus pegylated filgrastim-alone for autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Barbara Skopec; Matevz Skerget; Darja Zontar; Vesna Zadnik; Samo Zver
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.