Literature DB >> 16640331

Development of quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship models based on novel geometrical chemical descriptors of the protein-ligand interfaces.

Shuxing Zhang1, Alexander Golbraikh, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Novel geometrical chemical descriptors have been derived on the basis of the computational geometry of protein-ligand interfaces and Pauling atomic electronegativities (EN). Delaunay tessellation has been applied to a diverse set of 517 X-ray characterized protein-ligand complexes yielding a unique collection of interfacial nearest neighbor atomic quadruplets for each complex. Each quadruplet composition was characterized by a single descriptor calculated as the sum of the EN values for the four participating atom types. We termed these simple descriptors generated from atomic EN values and derived with the Delaunay Tessellation the ENTess descriptors and used them in the variable selection k-nearest neighbor quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship (QSBR) studies of 264 diverse protein-ligand complexes with known binding constants. Twenty-four complexes with chemically dissimilar ligands were set aside as an independent validation set, and the remaining dataset of 240 complexes was divided into multiple training and test sets. The best models were characterized by the leave-one-out cross-validated correlation coefficient q(2) as high as 0.66 for the training set and the correlation coefficient R(2) as high as 0.83 for the test set. The high predictive power of these models was confirmed independently by applying them to the validation set of 24 complexes yielding R(2) as high as 0.85. We conclude that QSBR models built with the ENTess descriptors can be instrumental for predicting the binding affinity of receptor-ligand complexes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16640331      PMCID: PMC2773514          DOI: 10.1021/jm050260x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  70 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Evaluation of PMF scoring in docking weak ligands to the FK506 binding protein.

Authors:  I Muegge; Y C Martin; P J Hajduk; S W Fesik
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Novel variable selection quantitative structure--property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000-01

4.  Scoring functions: a view from the bench.

Authors:  J R Tame
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Prediction of mutagenicity utilizing a hierarchical QSAR approach.

Authors:  S C Basak; D Mills
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): an improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Alexey V Ishchenko; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database.

Authors:  Gary D Bader; Doron Betel; Christopher W V Hogue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models.

Authors:  Alexander Golbraikh; Min Shen; Zhiyan Xiao; Yun-De Xiao; Kuo-Hsiung Lee; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Crystal structures of native and inhibited forms of human cathepsin D: implications for lysosomal targeting and drug design.

Authors:  E T Baldwin; T N Bhat; S Gulnik; M V Hosur; R C Sowder; R E Cachau; J Collins; A M Silva; J W Erickson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Crystal structures of metyrapone- and phenylimidazole-inhibited complexes of cytochrome P-450cam.

Authors:  T L Poulos; A J Howard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1987-12-15       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  25 in total

1.  Do crystal structures obviate the need for theoretical models of GPCRs for structure-based virtual screening?

Authors:  Hao Tang; Xiang Simon Wang; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-03-13

2.  A novel automated lazy learning QSAR (ALL-QSAR) approach: method development, applications, and virtual screening of chemical databases using validated ALL-QSAR models.

Authors:  Shuxing Zhang; Alexander Golbraikh; Scott Oloff; Harold Kohn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  From laptop to benchtop to bedside: structure-based drug design on protein targets.

Authors:  Lu Chen; John K Morrow; Hoang T Tran; Sharangdhar S Phatak; Lei Du-Cuny; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Hierarchical QSAR technology based on the Simplex representation of molecular structure.

Authors:  V E Kuz'min; A G Artemenko; E N Muratov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  A comparative study of family-specific protein-ligand complex affinity prediction based on random forest approach.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yanzhi Guo; Qifan Kuang; Xuemei Pu; Yue Ji; Zhihang Zhang; Menglong Li
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  The Development of Target-Specific Pose Filter Ensembles To Boost Ligand Enrichment for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Huabin Hu; Song Wu; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Study of peptide fingerprints of parasite proteins and drug-DNA interactions with Markov-Mean-Energy invariants of biopolymer molecular-dynamic lattice networks.

Authors:  Lázaro Guillermo Pérez-Montoto; María Auxiliadora Dea-Ayuela; Francisco J Prado-Prado; Francisco Bolas-Fernández; Florencio M Ubeira; Humberto González-Díaz
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  MedusaScore: an accurate force field-based scoring function for virtual drug screening.

Authors:  Shuangye Yin; Lada Biedermannova; Jiri Vondrasek; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures.

Authors:  Sourav Das; Michael P Krein; Curt M Breneman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  HIV-1 protease function and structure studies with the simplicial neighborhood analysis of protein packing method.

Authors:  Shuxing Zhang; Andrew H Kaplan; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.