Literature DB >> 15109165

Orientation-selective adaptation during motion-induced blindness.

Leila Montaser-Kouhsari1, Farshad Moradi, Amin Zandvakili, Hossein Esteky.   

Abstract

When a global moving pattern is superimposed on high-contrast stationary or slowly moving stimuli, the latter occasionally disappear for periods of several seconds (motion-induced blindness, MIB). Here, an adaptation paradigm was used to determine if orientation-selective adaptation still occurs for the stimulus that is no longer visible. Two slowly drifting high-contrast Gabor patches were presented to observers. As soon as both patches disappeared, one was eliminated from the screen. After 2 s, two low-contrast Gabor patches were presented as tests at the same locations and observers were asked to report their orientations. The observers' performance was significantly higher when the orientation of the low-contrast test patch was orthogonal to the orientation of the high-contrast adapting patch (p < 0.0001) for the location where the patch was present during MIB, even though it was perceptually invisible. The observers' performance was not significantly different at the adjacent control location where the stimulus was absent during the MIB. Although no stimulus was visible at either location, orientation-selective adaptation was preserved only for the location at which the patch remained present. Since orientation information is processed in low-level visual areas such as the primary visual cortex (V1), we conclude that MIB originates in an area higher than V1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15109165     DOI: 10.1068/p5174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  14 in total

1.  Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: cause and effect.

Authors:  Yoram S Bonneh; Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Moshe Fried; Alexander Cooperman; David J Heeger; Amos Arieli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: evidence from motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Werner Klotz; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

3.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interaction Between Conscious and Unconscious Information-Processing of Faces and Words.

Authors:  Shiwen Ren; Hanyu Shao; Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Sandwich masking eliminates both visual awareness of faces and face-specific brain activity through a feedforward mechanism.

Authors:  Joseph A Harris; Chien-Te Wu; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Perceptual and physiological evidence for a role for early visual areas in motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Camilo Libedinsky; Tristram Savage; Margaret Livingstone
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Neural correlates of motion-induced blindness in the human brain.

Authors:  Marieke L Schölvinck; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  A new taxonomy for perceptual filling-in.

Authors:  Rimona S Weil; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2010-11-05

9.  Motion-induced blindness and Troxler fading: common and different mechanisms.

Authors:  Yoram S Bonneh; Tobias H Donner; Alexander Cooperman; David J Heeger; Dov Sagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Time for Awareness: The Influence of Temporal Properties of the Mask on Continuous Flash Suppression Effectiveness.

Authors:  Weina Zhu; Jan Drewes; David Melcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.