Literature DB >> 16637717

Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.

Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira1, Heloisa Emilia Dias Silveira.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess reproducibility of cephalometric measurements in cephalograms obtained by three dentomaxillofacial radiology clinics. Forty lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected and sent at different times to three different clinics for cephalometric analyses. Each clinic digitized the radiographs with the same resolution, and landmarks were located with the mouse pointer directly on the digitized radiographic image on the screen. Three cephalograms were obtained from each radiograph, totaling 120 analyses. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance. Of the 32 factors studied, reproducibility of results was satisfactory for only four factors: position of maxilla relative to anterior cranial base, inclination of occlusal plane relative to anterior cranial base, position of lower incisor relative to nasion-pogonion line, and soft-tissue profile of face (P < .05). Differences in cephalometric measurements were present and such differences were significant for most factors analyzed. The different cephalometric measurements obtained by the three dental radiology clinics were not reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16637717     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0394:ROCMMB]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  Comparative study between conventional and cone beam CT-synthesized half and total skull cephalograms.

Authors:  G S Liedke; E L Delamare; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J R Prietsch; V Dutra; H E D da Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.

Authors:  E L Delamare; G S Liedke; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J L D Ribeiro; H E D Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of the anti-inflammatory effect of dexamethasone and ketorolac in the extractions of third molars.

Authors:  Janayna Gomes Paiva-Oliveira; Paulo Roberto Haidamus Oliveira Bastos; Elenir R J Cury Pontes; Júlio César Leite da Silva; Jéssica Andréa Berto Delgado; Nelson Talatoci Oshiro-Filho
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-11-16

4.  Combination of etodolac and dexamethasone improves preemptive analgesia in third molar surgery: a randomized study.

Authors:  Guilherme André D Ramires; Anderson Maikon de Souza Santos; Gustavo A C Momesso; Tárik Ocon B Polo; William P P Silva; Stéfany Barbosa; Ana Paula F Bassi; Leonardo Perez Faverani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between double readings of clinical measurements.

Authors:  Sonia Vieira; José Eduardo Corrente
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Test-retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors.

Authors:  Hsien-Shu Lin; Yunn-Jy Chen; Hsuan-Lun Lu; Tung-Wu Lu; Chien-Chih Chen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A triple-blind randomized clinical trial of different associations between dexamethasone and non-steroids anti-inflammatories for preemptive action in third molar extractions.

Authors:  Gustavo Antonio Correa Momesso; Gustavo Augusto Grossi-Oliveira; William Phillip Pereira Silva; Renan Akira; Fernando Chiba; Tárik Ocon Braga Polo; Tiburtino José de Lima Neto; Bárbara Ribeiro Rios; Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi; Doris Hissako Sumida; Michael Han; Michael Miloro; Leonardo Perez Faverani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ana Paula Reis Durão; Aline Morosolli; Pisha Pittayapat; Napat Bolstad; Afonso P Ferreira; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-12-17

9.  Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Jeong-Hoon Lee; Hee-Jin Yu; Min-Ji Kim; Jin-Woo Kim; Jongeun Choi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Sagittal Relationship between the Maxillary Central Incisors and the Forehead in Digital Twins of Korean Adult Females.

Authors:  Seoung-Won Cho; Soo-Hwan Byun; Sangmin Yi; Won-Seok Jang; Jong-Cheol Kim; In-Young Park; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-03-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.