Literature DB >> 16637025

Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface.

S J Ferguson1, N Broggini, M Wieland, M de Wild, F Rupp, J Geis-Gerstorfer, D L Cochran, D Buser.   

Abstract

The functional capacity of osseointegrated dental implants to bear load is largely dependent on the quality of the interface between the bone and implant. Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surfaces have been previously shown to enhance bone apposition. In this study, the SLA has been compared with a chemically modified SLA (modSLA) surface. The increased wettability of the modSLA surface in a protein solution was verified by dynamic contact angle analysis. Using a well-established animal model with a split-mouth experimental design, implant removal torque testing was performed to determine the biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface. All implants had an identical cylindrical shape with a standard thread configuration. Removal torque testing was performed after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of bone healing (n = 9 animals per healing period, three implants per surface type per animal) to evaluate the interfacial shear strength of each surface type. Results showed that the modSLA surface was more effective in enhancing the interfacial shear strength of implants in comparison with the conventional SLA surface during early stages of bone healing. Removal torque values of the modSLA-surfaced implants were 8-21% higher than those of the SLA implants (p = 0.003). The mean removal torque values for the modSLA implants were 1.485 N m at 2 weeks, 1.709 N m at 4 weeks, and 1.345 N m at 8 weeks; and correspondingly, 1.231 N m, 1.585 N m, and 1.143 N m for the SLA implants. The bone-implant interfacial stiffness calculated from the torque-rotation curve was on average 9-14% higher for the modSLA implants when compared with the SLA implants (p = 0.038). It can be concluded that the modSLA surface achieves a better bone anchorage during early stages of bone healing than the SLA surface; chemical modification of the standard SLA surface likely enhances bone apposition and this has a beneficial effect on the interfacial shear strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16637025     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  23 in total

1.  Preparation of superhydrophilic microrough titanium implant surfaces by alkali treatment.

Authors:  Stefano Tugulu; Konrad Löwe; Dieter Scharnweber; Falko Schlottig
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  [Chemically modified, ultra-hydrophilic titanium implant surfaces].

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Monika Herten; Marco Wieland; Michel Dard; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

3.  How is wettability of titanium surfaces influenced by their preparation and storage conditions?

Authors:  D Scharnweber; F Schlottig; S Oswald; K Becker; H Worch
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  The roles of titanium surface micro/nanotopography and wettability on the differential response of human osteoblast lineage cells.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Alice Cheng; David M Anderson; Taylor McLachlan; Ingrid Stephan; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Kenneth H Sandhage; Andrei G Fedorov; Frank Rupp; Barbara D Boyan; Rina Tannenbaum; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-24

6.  Osteoblast maturation and new bone formation in response to titanium implant surface features are reduced with age.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Andrew L Raines; Sharon L Hyzy; Jung Hwa Park; Daphne L Hutton; David L Cochran; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography.

Authors:  G Zhao; A L Raines; M Wieland; Z Schwartz; B D Boyan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Niklaus P Lang; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Osseointegration Improvement of Co-Cr-Mo Alloy Produced by Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Amilton Iatecola; Guilherme Arthur Longhitano; Luiz Henrique Martinez Antunes; André Luiz Jardini; Emilio de Castro Miguel; Miloslav Béreš; Carlos Salles Lambert; Tiago Neves Andrade; Rogério Leone Buchaim; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Karina Torres Pomini; Jefferson Aparecido Dias; Daniele Raineri Mesquita Serva Spressão; Marcílio Felix; Guinea Brasil Camargo Cardoso; Marcelo Rodrigues da Cunha
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface.

Authors:  Ann Wennerberg; Silvia Galli; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2011-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.