Literature DB >> 16634675

The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.

Yehoshua Tsal1, Tal Makovski.   

Abstract

The authors devised a prestimulus-probe method to assess the allocation of attention as a function of participants' top-down expectancies concerning distractor and target locations. Participants performed the flanker task, and distractor locations remained fixed. On some trials, instead of the flanker display, either 2 simultaneous dots or a horizontal line appeared. The dot in the expected distractor location was perceived to occur before the dot in the expected empty location, and the line appeared to extend from the expected distractor location to the expected empty location, suggesting that attention is allocated to expected distractor locations prior to stimulus onset. The authors propose that a process-all mechanism guides attention to expected locations of all stimuli regardless of task demands and that this constitutes a major cause for failures of selective attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634675     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew B Leber; Rachael E Gwinn; Yoolim Hong; Ryan J O'Toole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

2.  Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.

Authors:  Jason T Arita; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Jared Abrams; Howard E Egeth; Steven Yantis; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

5.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09

6.  Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Adam T Biggs; Bradley S Gibson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-19

7.  Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.

Authors:  Changrun Huang; Ana Vilotijević; Jan Theeuwes; Mieke Donk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-23

8.  Attention expedites target selection by prioritizing the neural processing of distractor features.

Authors:  Mandy V Bartsch; Christian Merkel; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Jens-Max Hopf
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-29

9.  Distraction and mind-wandering under load.

Authors:  Sophie Forster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-22

10.  Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Harriet A Allen; Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.