Literature DB >> 16634654

Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) monitor uncertainty during numerosity judgments.

Michael J Beran1, J David Smith, Joshua S Redford, David A Washburn.   

Abstract

Two rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) judged arrays of dots on a computer screen as having more or fewer dots than a center value that was never presented in trials. After learning a center value, monkeys were given an uncertainty response that let them decline to make the numerosity judgment on that trial. Across center values (3-7), errors occurred most often for sets adjacent in numerosity to the center value. The monkeys also used the uncertainty response most frequently on these difficult trials. A 2nd experiment showed that monkeys' responses reflected numerical magnitude and not the surface-area illumination of the displays. This research shows that monkeys' uncertainty-monitoring capacity extends to the domain of numerical cognition. It also shows monkeys' use of the purest uncertainty response possible, uncontaminated by any secondary motivator. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634654     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.2.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  36 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 2.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Arithmetic in newborn chicks.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Laura Fontanari; Eleonora Simoni; Lucia Regolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Theodore A Evans; Emilie Menzel; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.991

5.  Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.

Authors:  Allison Adams; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Sara E Futch; J David Smith; Theodore A Evans; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

Review 7.  Do actions speak louder than words? A comparative perspective on implicit versus explicit meta-cognition and theory of mind.

Authors:  Justin J Couchman; Michael J Beran; Mariana V C Coutinho; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria Zakrzewski; Barbara Church; J David Smith
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-10-19

8.  The interplay between uncertainty monitoring and working memory: Can metacognition become automatic?

Authors:  Mariana V C Coutinho; Joshua S Redford; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Justin J Couchman; J David Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

9.  Self-agency in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Justin J Couchman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.