Literature DB >> 16633229

Test-retest variability in structural and functional parameters of glaucoma damage in the glaucoma imaging longitudinal study.

Henry D Jampel1, Susan Vitale, Yulan Ding, Harry Quigley, David Friedman, Nathan Congdon, Ran Zeimer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest variability in perimetric, optic disc, and macular thickness parameters in a cohort of treated patients with established glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, the authors analyzed the imaging studies and visual field tests at the baseline and 6-month visits of 162 eyes of 162 participant in the Glaucoma Imaging Longitudinal Study (GILS). They assessed the difference, expressed as the standard error of measurement, of Humphrey field analyzer II (HFA) Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm fast, Heidelberg retinal tomograph (HRT) II, and retinal thickness analyzer (RTA) parameters between the two visits and assumed that this difference was due to measurement variability, not pathologic change. A statistically significant change was defined as twice the standard error of measurement.
RESULTS: In this cohort of treated glaucoma patients, it was found that statistically significant changes were 3.2 dB for mean deviation (MD), 2.2 for pattern standard deviation (PSD), 0.12 for cup shape measure, 0.26 mm for rim area, and 32.8 microm and 31.8 microm for superior and inferior macular thickness, respectively. On the basis of these values, it was estimated that the number of potential progression events detectable in this cohort by the parameters of MD, PSD, cup shape measure, rim area, superior macular thickness, and inferior macular thickness was 7.5, 6.0, 2.3, 5.7, 3.1, and 3.4, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The variability of the measurements of MD, PSD, and rim area, relative to the range of possible values, is less than the variability of cup shape measure or macular thickness measurements. Therefore, the former measurements may be more useful global measurements for assessing progressive glaucoma damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633229     DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200604000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  16 in total

1.  Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Bettina Selig; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Test-retest variability in structural parameters measured with glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head parameters measured with cirrus HD-OCT in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Mwanza; Robert T Chang; Donald L Budenz; Mary K Durbin; Mohamed G Gendy; Wei Shi; William J Feuer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Improved estimates of visual field progression using bayesian linear regression to integrate structural information in patients with ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; Balwantray C Chauhan; David P Crabb; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Effect of glaucomatous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Julio E DeLeón Ortega; Lisandro M Sakata; Bobby Kakati; Gerald McGwin; Blythe E Monheit; Stella N Arthur; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The effect of test variability on the structure-function relationship in early glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Chris A Johnson; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Glaucoma Diagnosis and Monitoring Using Advanced Imaging Technologies.

Authors:  Mitra Sehi; Shawn M Iverson
Journal:  US Ophthalmic Rev       Date:  2013

8.  Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Role of imaging in glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Gianmarco Vizzeri; Sara M Kjaergaard; Harsha L Rao; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Signal-to-Noise Ratios for Structural and Functional Tests in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.