Literature DB >> 16631048

Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence.

Francis W Price1, Marianne O Price.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe early challenges and techniques to promote donor tissue adherence in Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).
SETTING: Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
METHODS: The first 200 consecutive cases of DSEK performed by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up was 7 to 20 months for 124 eyes and 2 to 6 months for 76 eyes. The surgical technique consisted of stripping Descemet's membrane and endothelium from the recipient's central cornea and transplanting an 8.0 to 9.0 mm disc of donor endothelium and posterior stroma through a 5.0 mm incision, with sutures used only to close the incision.
RESULTS: The most frequent challenge was inadequate donor attachment. Using techniques to remove fluid from the donor-recipient graft interface, the donor detachment rate in the last 64 cases was 6%, with half attributable to patient eye rubbing. Detached grafts were reattached by injecting an air bubble to press the donor against the recipient cornea. There were 7 primary graft failures, with only 1 occurring in the second 100 cases, which primarily used microkeratome-dissected donor tissue. Other complications were infrequent and included pupillary block glaucoma (1), aqueous misdirection syndrome (1), and cataract development in 2 of 27 phakic eyes. The DSEK procedure was performed safely before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (1 each).
CONCLUSIONS: Early outcomes in the initial 200 consecutive DSEK procedures suggest the technique provides significant advantages over penetrating keratoplasty, including more rapid healing, more predictable refractive outcomes, and better retention of corneal strength and integrity. Although donor adherence was more challenging, DSEK was technically easier and should be less traumatic to anterior chamber structures than earlier posterior grafting techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16631048     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  122 in total

1.  Study of factors for unsuitability of DSAEK in cases of corneal decompensation following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Namrata Sharma; Ritika Sachdev; Ravindra M Pandey; Jeewan S Titiyal; Rajesh Sinha; Radhika Tandon; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Successful Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Goshe; Jennifer Y Li; Mark A Terry
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  [Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].

Authors:  M K J Klamann; A-K B Maier; J Gonnermann; N Torun; P C Ruokonen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Intraocular pressure elevation after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Naoki Ozeki; Kenya Yuki; Daisuke Shiba; Shigeto Shimmura; Dogru Murat; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema.

Authors:  Anna S Kitzmann; George R Wandling; John E Sutphin; Kenneth M Goins; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 6.  Surgical alternatives to penetrating keratoplasty II: endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kenneth M Goins
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Use of an air-fluid exchange system to promote graft adhesion during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  David M Meisler; William J Dupps; Douglas J Covert; Steven B Koenig
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 8.  Adult keratoplasty: has the prognosis improved in the last 25 years?

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Corneal endothelial cell loss 9 years after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel; William M Bourne
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11

10.  Evaluating DSAEK graft deturgescence in preservation medium after microkeratome cut with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Maolong Tang; Christopher Stoeger; Joshua Galloway; Jeffrey Holiman; Matthew R Bald; David Huang
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.