Literature DB >> 22661049

Study of factors for unsuitability of DSAEK in cases of corneal decompensation following cataract surgery.

Namrata Sharma1, Ritika Sachdev, Ravindra M Pandey, Jeewan S Titiyal, Rajesh Sinha, Radhika Tandon, Rasik B Vajpayee.   

Abstract

To evaluate suitability of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in cases of corneal decompensation following cataract surgery. In this cross-sectional case series, 90 eyes of 90 patients were evaluated at a tertiary eye care centre. Cases with central corneal scarring or vascularisation, complicated aphakia with significant iris tissue defects and extensive synechaie or posterior segment pathology precluding visual recovery were classified as unsuitable for DSAEK. Of 90 eyes, 42 (46.67%) were unsuitable for DSAEK. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, revealed that patients presenting more than a year after cataract surgery had 7.5-fold odds of being unsuitable for DSAEK as compared with those who presented earlier(OR 7.5; CI 2.0-29.1). Patients with BCVA poorer than 0.06 at initial presentation had 5.0 times odds of being unsuitable for DSAEK (OR 5.0; CI 1.0-24.2). Patients who had prior non-phacoemulsification cataract surgery were 5.5 times less likely to be candidates for DSAEK as compared to those who had prior phacoemulsification (OR 5.5; CI 1.5-19.9) and those with anterior chamber IOL or aphakia were 5.0 times less likely suitable for DSAEK, in contrast to posterior chamber intraocular lenses (OR 5.0; CI 1.3-18.7). The type of cataract surgery, time to presentation and initial visual acuity play a role in determining the suitability of performing DSAEK in patients with corneal decompensation after cataract surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661049     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-012-9521-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  18 in total

1.  Posterior lamellar disc dislocation into the vitreous cavity during descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Martin Grueterich; Elisabeth Messmer; A Kampik
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 2.  Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK--the thinner the better?

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India.

Authors:  Parul Sony; Namrata Sharma; Seema Sen; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated descemet membrane transplantation: descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Lisanne Ham; Chandra Balachandran; Christianne A Verschoor; Jacqueline van der Wees; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03

5.  Refractive change after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery and its correlation with graft thickness and diameter.

Authors:  Bokkwan Jun; Anthony N Kuo; Natalie A Afshari; Alan N Carlson; Terry Kim
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Eliya Levinger; Wiwan Sansanayudh; Allan R Slomovic; David S Rootman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Penny McAllum; Allan Slomovic; David Rootman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Neda Shamie; Edwin S Chen; Paul M Phillips; Anand K Shah; Karen L Hoar; Daniel J Friend
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Endothelial keratoplasty: case selection in the learning curve.

Authors:  Paul D O'Brien; Damian B Lake; Valerie P Saw; Chad K Rostron; John K Dart; Bruce D Allan
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Complications of Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at One Institute.

Authors:  Leejee H Suh; Sonia H Yoo; Avnish Deobhakta; Kendall E Donaldson; Eduardo C Alfonso; William W Culbertson; Terrence P O'Brien
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  4 in total

1.  Results of excimer laser penetrating keratoplasty in aphakic eyes.

Authors:  K Ninios; P Matoula; N Szentmary; F Schirra; B Seitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity.

Authors:  Philip Maier; Thomas Reinhard; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Repeat keratoplasty in failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Manpreet Kaur; Jeewan S Titiyal; Meghal Gagrani; Farin Shaikh; Tushar Agarwal; Rajesh Sinha; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Microscope Integrated Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided DMEK in Corneas with Poor Visualization.

Authors:  Namrata Sharma; Pranita Sahay; Prafulla K Maharana; Praveen Kumar; Saima Ahsan; Jeewan S Titiyal
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.